Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • LDA Agenda (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    The thesis behind this question is that the Assembly has a statutory responsibility to hold the LDA to account, but you are not a creature of regional government; there are these multiple accountabilities. If we are to do our job in holding you to account effectively, we need to see how these conflicts are working, and we talked offline about the difficulty of, for example, making available publicly a Government Office for London quarterly assessment of you. I think we need to explore further how to see that relationship working better with government. Moving on to the second question relating...
  • LDA Agenda (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    In relation to the mayoral interventions, either directly or through advisors, at the Economic and Social Development Committee you said that there had never been a time when you had actually refused a request. There had been vigorous discussions, but the answer had never been `no'.
  • Improving Tube frequencies

    • Reference: 2003/0139
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    London Underground's own passenger surveys show that a key priority for Londoners on the Tube is improving train frequencies. Which trains on which lines do you expect to be more frequent by the end of June 2004, and by May 2008? .
  • Overcrowding on the Tube

    • Reference: 2003/0140
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What methods do you believe will be most effective in giving passengers more space within Tube carriages especially at peak hours? How do you plan to work with the infracos to prevent passengers being crammed up against each other? .
  • Reducing Tube delays

    • Reference: 2003/0141
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What do you believe will be the most effective way of reducing passenger journey delays? By how much do you expect to have reduced passenger journey delays over the next five years? .
  • Overcrowding on Platforms

    • Reference: 2003/0142
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What steps do you plan to take to avoid dangerous overcrowding on platforms? .
  • Safety on the Tube

    • Reference: 2003/0143
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Do you have plans to make it safer, especially for vulnerable passengers, to travel on the Underground late at night " not only on trains and within stations, but also within the vicinity of Tube stations? .
  • Disabled access on the Tube

    • Reference: 2003/0144
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    How many Tube stations will be made fully accessible for disabled people over the next five years? .
  • Transport for London and the Tube

    • Reference: 2003/0146
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What discussions have you had with the Secretary of State for Transport to determine the date on which London Underground will be handed over to Transport for London? What is your own estimate of this date? .
  • PPP and contracts

    • Reference: 2003/0147
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Who will be in actual charge of negotiating the contracts with the PPP contractors so that within the constraints imposed on LT, attempts are made to get the best possible improvements in service from the contractors? .