Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    Mr Higgins, I am grateful for that. Could you address Mr Hockney's point of why we learn about these problems, which Sir Roy (McNulty) has referred to, in effect from The Idaho Statesman. I think that is the point of Mr Hockney's question. Damian Hockney (AM): It is, yes. Brian Coleman (Chairman): I would be grateful if you would address that.
  • Budget (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    In particular could you address the issue of VAT, Mr Higgins?
  • Stadium

    • Reference: 2006/0390-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    Mr Lemley was particularly concerned about the impact of political disagreements on the future of the main stadium. Is this not a repeat of exactly what went wrong at Wembley? We are particularly referring to the issue of whether it should be an athletics stadium or a premier league football stadium.
  • Stratford City (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    You would not have thought that if you were on the Northern Line this morning.
  • Stratford City (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    I think that brings us to the end of our hour and a half. Mr Higgins, the Assembly is deeply obliged to you for the time you have given this morning. Thank you very much.
  • Land Assembly and Preparation of the 2012 Olympic Games (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    I wonder if therefore it would be helpful if you could give the answer to the next question from Bob Blackman on construction costs before all those Members who have indicated they want to talk on finance. Can you just cover the issue of rise in inflation in relation to construction costs as you have raised it?
  • Progress Update

    • Reference: 2006/0103-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    Could you provide an overview of the Olympic Delivery Authority and what you have achieved so far?
  • Terms of the termination of your engagement to which TfL have agreed. (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    Mr Kiley, in answer to my colleague, Bob Blackman, you mentioned that you would not disclose details that affected other personnel. Are there any other members of TfL staff ' either in the Commissioner's office or elsewhere ' who are leaving as a result of your departure? Have you negotiated any pay-offs for them?
  • A406 Major scheme selection

    • Reference: 2005/0099-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Following the Spending Review 2004 announcement, were your views sought or given on which schemes should proceed within the available funding? Did you express a view that lower risk schemes such as the major A406 schemes in Barnet, which have cleared all planning and legal requirements, should be given priority over higher risk schemes which are still subject to consultation and public inquiry? If not, do you consider this would have been prudent advice?
  • A406 Smaller scale scheme at Bounds Green

    • Reference: 2005/0100-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Although a capacity increase of 20% resulting from the revised TfL scheme for Bounds Green was discussed at the meeting between the Mayor and borough representatives on 3 February 2005, TfL now appear to have no knowledge of this. Would you agree that it is vital for local residents to be told exactly what increase in capacity the TfL scheme will deliver, not least to help them understand whether the scheme offers value for money? Do you know what percentage increase in capacity will be delivered by the scheme and are you willing to quote this figure publicly?