Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Silverlink Metro Services (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Therefore you are actually putting it up to help fill a deficit. ... To balance the books. As the penalty revenue falls you are predicting a deficit.
  • Silverlink Metro Services (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Staying on the subject of revenue from Congestion Charging - is not the problem for TfL that they foresee a huge drop in the amount of revenue from Congestion Charging as people learn to manoeuvre themselves through the rather Byzantine payment system, whereby you will be getting less penalty money? Is not the whole point of jacking it up from £5 to £8 actually to make a start on filling the deficit that TfL has actually prophesied itself?
  • Silverlink Metro Services (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    What about the public inquiry the ALG has called for, a cross-party call to you?
  • Silverlink Metro Services (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Can I ask about one other aspect? Recently, there was a call from the Association of London Government (ALG), a cross-party call, for a pause in this whole rolling out of the Congestion Charge westwards, and to allow for a public inquiry to take place, not least because we understand, and you yourself went on record to say that some very interesting trial work was being done on tag and beacon. Would it not be better to pause before you put all these cameras in and have a public inquiry to look at where we are on this whole issue?
  • Appointment of Tfl Directors (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Looking ahead, what changes could you envisage on the board as and when TfL takes on the responsibility for rail services, particularly over a geographic area beyond London?
  • Crossrail

    • Reference: 2005/0026-1
    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    How confident are you of funding for Crossrail? How are you going to limit the impact of construction on the local business and residential communities in central London? What are the outstanding planning issues? .... Moving on to Crossrail, earlier you alluded to the historic levels of investment we are getting into London's transport infrastructure, and this really would be the icing on the cake having the Crossrail investment put in. Where are we with the funding in light of what the Montague Report was saying in the context of today?
  • Enforcement of Foreign Vehicles

    • Reference: 2005/0020-1
    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    What action is TfL taking to tackle the low success rate in enforcement of foreign vehicles who do not pay the congestion charge?
  • TfL Board

    • Reference: 2005/0035-1
    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    How would you see the TfL Board needing to change as the Government expands the role of the authority to cover some rail services outside London?
  • TfL Employees

    • Reference: 2005/0037-1
    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    What are you doing to ensure that TfL employees are all treated with respect by the organisation?
  • Bakerloo Service

    • Reference: 2005/0060-1
    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    How can the Bakerloo service between Queen's Park and Harrow be improved when this part of the line is outside the PPP?