Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 2

Status

Year

  • Provisions of Consultancy (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    The reason that I am interested in that is, is there going to be anything in addition to the fee, which was upfront and we have seen that, up to 90 days, how that is calculated? You are keeping the occupancy of the premises in Belgravia; that is part of the negotiated deal, I take it. Will there be other matters? For example, the council tax on that property, insurance, pension contributions ' will that cover the lot?

  • Provisions of Consultancy (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    What is the essential difference between what service you are going to be providing as a consultant, and what the role of Peter Hendy is as the Transport Commissioner, and what the role of Redmond O'Neill is as the (GLA's) Executive Director of Public Affairs and Transport? Where is the line between them? Is there a line or is there not?

  • Reasons for your leaving TfL (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    I understand what you have said, and I need not recap it. This is a challenging job but a lot has been done, but there is still more to do. There is much that you could be judged proud of and you are clearly anxious to be still in the policy and the strategic decisions, so to move to a consultant role was a slightly unnatural one for you. I assume that was your state of mind when you signed the new contract: that you were still up for it and ready to go.

  • Extension to Victoria Underground Lines Southwards to Herne Hill (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Are you saying that you will not be ready to put in a serious bid for funding for phase two in Spending Review 2006?

  • Extension to Victoria Underground Lines Southwards to Herne Hill (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Moving back to capital for transport infrastructure development, we are probably only about a year away now from the next Spending Review, 2006, can you talk us through what processes of development are going on within TfL to make sure we get a good second bite of the cherry and what preparation and business case development is going on?

  • Extension to Victoria Underground Lines Southwards to Herne Hill (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    If I can be a little more parochial and talk about London again. One of the projects halted until the 2006 Spending Review that is extremely important to London, is the phase two extension on the ELL Project. Given that there is only say a year to go to Spending Review 2006 and you have talked about the fact that you are developing capacity and putting together London Rail at the moment as a business unit, what development is going on of the business cases for phase two of the ELL extension? Especially bearing in mind that there are two...

  • Silverlink Metro Services (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Does Professor Glaister's comment accurately reflect the view of the TfL board as far as Congestion Charging is concerned in its purpose?

  • Appointment of Tfl Directors (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Do I understand that when the Mayor told us that he had agreed with you that he would not appoint anybody to the board that you disapproved of, he was wrong?

  • Appointment of Tfl Directors (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    The Mayor told us that he had given you that assurance. Are you telling us that he has not given you such an assurance?

  • Appointment of Tfl Directors (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Would you agree that for a chief executive to have a veto over, in effect, the non-executive directors of any organisation would be wholly unacceptable in terms of proper corporate governance?