Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Reasons for your leaving TfL (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    Was it your suggestion, the sums of money you were going to acquire as a consultant and the one-off payment? If you add up the sums, as far as we know, you will be earning in the first two years just as much as you were before, but working less. Was that your terms or was that the Mayor's terms?
  • Terms of the termination of your engagement to which TfL have agreed. (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    Mr Kiley, in answer to my colleague, Bob Blackman, you mentioned that you would not disclose details that affected other personnel. Are there any other members of TfL staff ' either in the Commissioner's office or elsewhere ' who are leaving as a result of your departure? Have you negotiated any pay-offs for them?
  • Provisions of Consultancy (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    How will that work on the PPP? It is critical that that is renegotiated for the benefit of Londoners. You will be developing your thoughts and providing advice, but then your contract ends some two years before the actual negotiations. When the Mayor announced your position, he made it quite clear that the renegotiations for the PPP would be one of your key roles.
  • Provisions of Consultancy (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    Without your line responsibility, you will be able to get much more done in 90 days. When we take on board the fact that you said you had built the world's best management team for transport, it is starting to feel as though it is getting a bit overcrowded with expertise and the best guys around at the top there. We are concerned about this. Is there not a risk that the role of Commissioner, which was obviously important in the early days, is now getting rather squeezed?
  • Reasons for your leaving TfL (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    I am interested to know what made you change your mind compared with a year ago and now. What has happened?
  • Reasons for your leaving TfL (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    Do you regret the timing of this, coming at the same time as we have this large fare increase? Many Londoners are upset with the 10% or more increase at the same time as the sums of money that you are being provided with are being highlighted. Was that not bad timing?
  • Reasons for your leaving TfL (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    When you decided that you would leave this particular role, did you just go into the Mayor and say, `I am going'? Was there a negotiation?
  • A406 Major scheme selection

    • Reference: 2005/0099-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Following the Spending Review 2004 announcement, were your views sought or given on which schemes should proceed within the available funding? Did you express a view that lower risk schemes such as the major A406 schemes in Barnet, which have cleared all planning and legal requirements, should be given priority over higher risk schemes which are still subject to consultation and public inquiry? If not, do you consider this would have been prudent advice?
  • A406 Smaller scale scheme at Bounds Green

    • Reference: 2005/0100-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Although a capacity increase of 20% resulting from the revised TfL scheme for Bounds Green was discussed at the meeting between the Mayor and borough representatives on 3 February 2005, TfL now appear to have no knowledge of this. Would you agree that it is vital for local residents to be told exactly what increase in capacity the TfL scheme will deliver, not least to help them understand whether the scheme offers value for money? Do you know what percentage increase in capacity will be delivered by the scheme and are you willing to quote this figure publicly?
  • A406 and Strategic Road Network

    • Reference: 2005/0101-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    In responding to the London Borough of Barnet's objections to the designation of the A598 as a Strategic Road, the Government Office for London has stated: 'The A598 is an important route in the SRN. It provides an important link between the A41 and Golders Green and North Finchley as an alternative to using the congested A41 and A406.' Do you regard the suggestion that traffic should use this borough road as an alternative to the TLRN as criticism of TfL's management of the A41 and A406? Can you explain what measures TfL will implement to reduce congestion on the...