Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 2

Status

Year

  • Terms of the termination of your engagement to which TfL have agreed. (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 18 January 2006
    Mr Kiley, in answer to my colleague, Bob Blackman, you mentioned that you would not disclose details that affected other personnel. Are there any other members of TfL staff ' either in the Commissioner's office or elsewhere ' who are leaving as a result of your departure? Have you negotiated any pay-offs for them?

  • Extension to Victoria Underground Lines Southwards to Herne Hill (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Are you saying that you will not be ready to put in a serious bid for funding for phase two in Spending Review 2006?

  • Extension to Victoria Underground Lines Southwards to Herne Hill (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Moving back to capital for transport infrastructure development, we are probably only about a year away now from the next Spending Review, 2006, can you talk us through what processes of development are going on within TfL to make sure we get a good second bite of the cherry and what preparation and business case development is going on?

  • Extension to Victoria Underground Lines Southwards to Herne Hill (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    If I can be a little more parochial and talk about London again. One of the projects halted until the 2006 Spending Review that is extremely important to London, is the phase two extension on the ELL Project. Given that there is only say a year to go to Spending Review 2006 and you have talked about the fact that you are developing capacity and putting together London Rail at the moment as a business unit, what development is going on of the business cases for phase two of the ELL extension? Especially bearing in mind that there are two...

  • A406 Major scheme selection

    • Reference: 2005/0099-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Following the Spending Review 2004 announcement, were your views sought or given on which schemes should proceed within the available funding? Did you express a view that lower risk schemes such as the major A406 schemes in Barnet, which have cleared all planning and legal requirements, should be given priority over higher risk schemes which are still subject to consultation and public inquiry? If not, do you consider this would have been prudent advice?

  • A406 Smaller scale scheme at Bounds Green

    • Reference: 2005/0100-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Although a capacity increase of 20% resulting from the revised TfL scheme for Bounds Green was discussed at the meeting between the Mayor and borough representatives on 3 February 2005, TfL now appear to have no knowledge of this. Would you agree that it is vital for local residents to be told exactly what increase in capacity the TfL scheme will deliver, not least to help them understand whether the scheme offers value for money? Do you know what percentage increase in capacity will be delivered by the scheme and are you willing to quote this figure publicly?

  • A406 and Strategic Road Network

    • Reference: 2005/0101-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    In responding to the London Borough of Barnet's objections to the designation of the A598 as a Strategic Road, the Government Office for London has stated: 'The A598 is an important route in the SRN. It provides an important link between the A41 and Golders Green and North Finchley as an alternative to using the congested A41 and A406.' Do you regard the suggestion that traffic should use this borough road as an alternative to the TLRN as criticism of TfL's management of the A41 and A406? Can you explain what measures TfL will implement to reduce congestion on the...

  • North Cyprus Holiday Advertisements

    • Reference: 2005/0102-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Will the Commissioner accept my thanks on behalf of many of my constituents for Transport for London's refusal to allow advertisements for holiday destinations to the illegal and unrecognised Turkish Republic of North Cyprus on London Buses and the Tube?

  • East London Line

    • Reference: 2005/0051-1
    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    To what extent is TfL keeping wider options of the Phase 2 of the East London Line under review - there may be a case for going ahead with both the Wimbledon and Clapham arm which would strengthen the core business case.

  • East London Line

    • Reference: 2005/0052-1
    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 06 April 2005
    Will TfL consider a further branch of the ELLX to Stratford as part of Phase 2 - given the Olympic bid and the prospect of increasing passengers' journeys along the southern sections.