Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Question and Answer Session: London Legacy Development Corporation (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2023
    Len Duvall OBE AM: On the Stadium, since you have both been in position, we have stabilised the costs around the Stadium. We understand more about what the Stadium can do or cannot do. You have conversations with all the tenants and particularly you have opened up a relationship with the anchor tenant, but there are still legal issues and they are about the contracts that you have between your good selves. What is the future of the Stadium? What does that look like over the coming years? What are the potential options around that? Could you just give us...
  • Question and Answer Session: London Legacy Development Corporation (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2023
    Len Duvall OBE AM: Let us go back to real estate around the Stadium. Most of that would have been part of the open space and parkland. There are no options and nothing under your plans that you would build on that open space element that is included in your development area.
  • Oral Update (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 03 December 2008
    Thank you for the way that you answered John Biggs' question. In light of your answer, will you go away and reflect to see that it is appropriate, and I might have some sentiments about where you think the outcome of things may go, for you or your office to talk to a potential suspect, even though you have nor role at all, but you may have information and be given information in briefings, during a criminal investigation? Will you go away to reflect?
  • Oral Update (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 03 December 2008
    Can I welcome the remarks from Sir Paul Stephenson clarifying matters. I do welcome part of some of your remarks around where the police must be allowed to carry on and see this through, and at the appropriate time people will come back and look at it. In light of that, do you think it was appropriate to share your comments publicly about the ongoing police investigation was right?