Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Healthy Streets in the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Tom Copley
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2017
    Good morning. I also have a few questions on the Healthy Streets agenda. The Mayor’s draft Transport Strategy says: “It is essential that a new street network is developed using the Healthy Streets approach to make walking and cycling the first choice across the area.” It also says: “High quality and reliable bus links to and through the area from existing residential communities will also be required to ensure that everyone benefits from the proposals at Old Oak.” How do you balance the competing demands for road space from both these priorities?
  • Vision for Old Oak Common (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Onkar Sahota
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2017
    Dr Onkar Sahota AM: I expected my colleague to go first but, anyway, can you provide me an update into the work being done to refine the results of the Development Infrastructure Fund (DIF), which you referred to in your meeting in March of this year? Can you update us on what work has been done on that?
  • Vision for Old Oak Common (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Fiona Twycross
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2017
    Fiona Twycross AM: Thank you. I was pleased to hear about the work you have commissioned on intensification because of the point that my colleague Nicky Gavron [AM] made about employment in industrial land.
  • Priorities for the OPDC (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 08 March 2017
    What are your plans to unlock the full potential of Old Oak and Park Royal in regard to housing density whilst making it an attractive place to live in?
  • Priorities for the OPDC (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Tom Copley
    • Meeting date: 08 March 2017
    Tom Copley AM: My next question perhaps is more for David [Bellamy] or Fiona. The report from the review recommends that public land is potentially wholly transferred to the GLA. To what extent does central Government recognise the complexities of the land and what discussions had the Mayor had around the proposal of land transfer?
  • Sustained Legacy?

    • Reference: 2015/0799
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 11 March 2015
    Are you confident the Legacy will have the capacity to be sustained past your departure in 2016?
  • Planning Application for Swan Wharf in Fish Island & White Post Lane Conservation Area

    • Reference: 2015/0803
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 11 March 2015
    I am gravely concerned about the plans for Swan Wharf in Fish Island & White Post Lane Conservation Area because of the potential impact this will have on the fabulous artist community in the area. What reassurances can you offer me that these plans will not lead to current tenants being priced out of the area?
  • Smithsonian Institution - 1

    • Reference: 2015/0805
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 11 March 2015
    What is the timeline for your discussions with the Smithsonian Institution, and when do you imagine you will have a decision about whether or not they will join 'Olympicopolis'?
  • Smithsonian Institution - 2

    • Reference: 2015/0806
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 11 March 2015
    What will the LLDC be looking to achieve with its discussions with the Smithsonian Institution (SI) in terms of what type of provision the SI should provide, and the relationship the LLDC expects to have with the SI should a deal be struck?
  • Newham Travellers

    • Reference: 2015/0807
    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 11 March 2015
    What plans do you have to honour the promise to relocate the Newham travellers into the Olympic Park in legacy? Alternatively, what steps are you taking to compensate them for their loss of opportunity?