Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Low carbon building refurbishment

    • Reference: 2010/0075-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2010
    Can you break down LFEPA's expenditure on the Building Energy Efficiency Programme (BEEP), now known as RE:FIT, in 2009/10 and 2010/11 by the source of funding (i.e. LFEPA capital, LDA grant, etc.)?
  • Low carbon refurbishment of fire stations

    • Reference: 2010/0076-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2010
    Will the Building Energy Efficiency Programme (now known as RE:FIT) for 10 fire stations be deferred again in the 2011/12 budget?
  • Energy efficiency measures

    • Reference: 2010/0077-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2010
    Are you considering any changes to the planned expenditure on energy efficiency measures (outside the BEEP/ RE:FIT programme) up to 2014/15, as a result of the Mayor's budget guidance?
  • Incinerators

    • Reference: 2002/0231-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Is the Mayor's waste strategy strong enough to avoid the need for new incinerators in London? .
  • Waste Minimisation and Reduction

    • Reference: 2002/0234-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Are the Mayor's advisors committed to a strong policy for waste minimisation and reduction? .
  • Implementation and Partnerships (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Just quickly on the wheelie bins. Is it not the question of how large or small the wheelie bins are and that local authorities have tended to invest in wheelie bins that have turned out to be far too big, that people can shove everything in. If instead they had gone for smaller bins it would have created a lot less problems. When they look at replacing bins, as part of the general replacement programme, they need to look at the smaller size in place of the big ones.
  • New Combustion Technologies

    • Reference: 2001/0237-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    Are you aware that the Thermoselect HTR (High Temperature Recycling) flagship Plant at Karlsruhe, (quoted in the Draft Waste Strategy as having `emissions of less than 10% of those permitted by the German Regulations') was closed down in October 2000 for at least seven months because of a breach of German emission regulations? How will this affect the Waste Strategy's stance on new combustion technologies? .
  • Effective Working Partnerships (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    So other changes will be made during the public consultation stage, not during the Assembly consultation stage? You'll really just be noting the London Waste Action stakeholder dialogue comments at the moment, you won't be making any changes on those until they go to public consultation?
  • New Combustion Technologies (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    So you think there's generally no problem then? It's the sort of plant that you'd like to see research in for getting in to London then?
  • New Combustion Technologies (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    Of course there are new technologies and new technologies. In the Environmental Committee's scrutiny report it talks about some alternatives to thermal treatment as part of new technologies and the Mayor looking into that to deal with residual waste issues. How do we intend to take that recommendation forward?