Search questions

• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

And there are long term plans for financing these facilities beyond the Games, because, as we know, swimming pools for instance, are very expensive for somebody to take on, long term?

• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

So, for instance, in Hackney, there will be the opportunity for local communities perhaps to take over football fields, pitches and that sort of thing there?

• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

I was listening to what you were saying to John Biggs and I take on board that you have steering groups of all sorts looking at how you develop the facilities with their legacy beyond the Games in mind. Can I just seek some clarification then? Are you saying that you already have teams of people in place who are organising proper financial and business plans for these venues, so they can be seamlessly transferred after the Games to groups who will then be taking them on to use them in the future?

• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 11 December 2002

I wondered if you thought it good for the health of London that the National Health Service in London in a letter to us reckons the cost of the congestion charge to them is going to be somewhere near £20 million. Is that good for the health of London?

• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 11 December 2002

I think that actually Londoners will be interested to hear that £20 million of this so-called money that is coming towards the health of London is going straight into the Mayor's pocket. I'm not certain that's where it should be aiming. It's meant to be aiming for front-line services, I would have thought. What about the health of people living in central London, given that we've already heard from nurses that if they don't get exemptions to bring their own cars to work when they're on night shift, they're going to be applying for transfer out of the central zone...