Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Potential for Further Budget Increases (Supplementary) [26]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Have any of you, collectively?

  • Potential for Further Budget Increases (Supplementary) [27]

    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Who will have responsibility for vetting the sub-contractors and sub-contractors' employees?

  • Potential for Further Budget Increases (Supplementary) [28]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    You don't want to reinvent the wheel.

  • Potential for Further Budget Increases (Supplementary) [29]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    I was going to ask for slightly more than Geoff Pope has requested, which was if you can provide us, at the least, with a breakdown now of the transport costs which are, if you like, capital; the investment in the Jubilee Line upgrade and so on, and the revenue costs which relate to the operational matters that you have described?

  • Potential for Further Budget Increases (Supplementary) [30]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    So you do not see that as a major risk in financial terms?

  • Potential for Further Budget Increases (Supplementary) [31]

    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    There is a belief within the Metropolitan Police Authority that a substantial part of that £863 million is for the security of the delivery of the Games in 2012. I was asking what your security costs for the build phase are?

  • Legacy (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    I still find it extraordinary that your idea of producing facilities that are at least as good includes a facility of a road racing track that is both sides of a main road. That is just ludicrous.

  • Legacy (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    When I was in the negotiations with the LDA it was never, ever suggested that the track that the Eastway Users' Group would go back to would be on two sides of a main road. I can assure you. I was there. It was never even suggested.

  • Legacy (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    I have had some involvement in this issue, and life is never quite as straightforward as it might seem. I think we should note that the cyclists, quite rightly, in a consultation, rejected an option for relocation to Enfield which, although it was very strongly opposed by them for a range of good reasons, did have a fundamentally different configuration from the arrangements we now have in front of us. I think it is also interesting that in a press release that came out today the British Cycling Chief Executive says, `The Olympic Velopark will be a huge boost to...

  • Legacy (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Sorry, can you enlighten us as to what wildlife?