Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Re-zoning

    • Reference: 2007/0180-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Can TfL use its influence to press for the rezoning of Zone 6 rail stations like Kingston and Surbiton where 20,000 annual season ticket holders face fare increases of £400?
  • Traffic Signal Unit

    • Reference: 2007/0185-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    What is being done to improve the responsiveness of the Traffic Signal Unit?
  • Re-zoning (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    There is not enough time to argue about the figures we have. Perhaps we could deal with that off-line. Could you just tell me, would you encourage and support South West Trains to look at rezoning Kingston and Surbiton from zone 6 to zone 5?
  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    I am just looking for an order of magnitude. Are we talking about £100 or £10 billion?
  • Legacy (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    I still find it extraordinary that your idea of producing facilities that are at least as good includes a facility of a road racing track that is both sides of a main road. That is just ludicrous.
  • Legacy (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    When I was in the negotiations with the LDA it was never, ever suggested that the track that the Eastway Users' Group would go back to would be on two sides of a main road. I can assure you. I was there. It was never even suggested.
  • Legacy (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Can I come back to some of the specifics? Take the Eastway Users' Group specifically, which is what my prime concern is about and about which, as you know, I have been negotiating quite a lot with your officials. First of all your officials told me that British Cycling was in favour of the application that you had put in. British Cycling told me last night that they are certainly not in favour of it, and they referred me to their website. Their website describes the plans that you have as `unacceptable' and I understand from them that that has...
  • Legacy (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    I want to put it on record I think it is totally unacceptable, particularly when your officers tell me that the way to enhance it is to put some screening up. The whole situation is appalling. It is not the way that you should be thinking. We are supposed to be leaving a sports legacy, and this is not the way to leave a sports legacy for cyclists.
  • Legacy

    • Reference: 2007/0022-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Is the news that the ODA have reduced the area which will house the Olympic Velopark in legacy mode from the originally agreed 34 hectares to just 7 hectares just the start of things to come? How much more scaling down of legacy facilities do you anticipate might take place if the ODA faces additional budget deficits, and the need to increase revenues from land sales?
  • Park and Ride

    • Reference: 2006/0531-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    The Mayor seemed positively disposed towards retaining the "Park and Ride" car-parks that will be provided for the 2012 Olympics close to the M25 north and south of the river to the East of London. Is any other work going on to carry forward Proposal 4E.14 of the Mayor's Transport Strategy - for example to make provision for cars coming off the M40 at Hillingdon or off the M1 at Junction 4 near Stanmore?