Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • COVID-19 Vaccination Delivery in London (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Unmesh Desai
    • Meeting date: 04 February 2021
    Unmesh Desai AM: Dr Jameel, the criteria for vaccination in the UK has been to protect the NHS. Other countries have prioritised younger people to support the economy. Is that strategy working? Is it the right one? The reason I am asking this question is that it is important that Londoners know and understand the scientific and medical evidence upon which we are working.
  • COVID-19 Vaccination Delivery in London

    • Reference: 2023/1481
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 04 February 2021
    Is London now receiving its fair share of COVID-19 vaccinations and can we be confident that it will continue to do so over the coming months?
  • Public disorder incidents in London

    • Reference: 2011/0116-1
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    Can I open this session by putting the question to both of you: what are the key learning points and the next steps arising from the recent public disorder incidents in London? Can I ask the Acting Commissioner to start?
  • Public disorder incidents in London (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2011
    I would like initially to thank you, Commissioner, for ensuring that the borough commanders in my part of London were able to, by having a show of strength, prevent any trouble in any of the boroughs which I represent, and I thank him for that. The question I would like to ask is probably one for Kit. One of the few positive things which has come out of this has been the demonstration that it is possible to cut through the red tape which there habitually is in bringing people to justice. The rapidity, swiftness and certainty of punishment has...
  • Limitations of CCTV

    • Reference: 2007/0109-1
    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    A joint report by the Home Office and police found that more than 80% of CCTV pictures are of such poor quality they are no good for police purposes, and most cameras are in the wrong places to help in fighting serious crime or terrorism. * Is the purpose of CCTV cameras, to tackle low-level, high-volume crime and disorder in town centres, being undermined by a lack of quality? * The report also claimed that authorities have no idea how many cameras exist despite claims that Britain is the most watched nation in the world, with more than 4m in...
  • Budget Priorities

    • Reference: 2007/0110-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    In allocating your police budget between different types of policing activity, what are your priorities and where are you seeking savings?
  • Next Steps for SNTS?

    • Reference: 2007/0111-1
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    What are the next steps for Safer Neighbourhood Teams in London?
  • Government Targets

    • Reference: 2007/0112-1
    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    Do you share the view of Bob Quick, Chief Constable of Surrey that government targets are making officers and the CPS "skew" their operations towards easy results?
  • Impact of Olympics on MPS Budget

    • Reference: 2007/0113-1
    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    Can you please supply a summary of the impact of the 2012 Olympics on the MPS Budget between now and 2013? There have been suggestions that some aspects of security in the Budget for 2012 are not allowed for in either the MPS Budget or the revised 2012 Budget. Please can you state what is being done to ensure that London council tax payers will not be required to fund this expenditure.
  • Carbon offsetting

    • Reference: 2007/0114-1
    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    How much has the MPS spent on 'carbon offsetting' between 2004 and 2007, and is it not absurd that the EU will in future force us to pay VAT on these additional costs to the taxpayer?