Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Commissioner Recruitment

    • Reference: 2016/2841
    • Question by: Gareth Bacon MP
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2016
    Why were proposals to recruit an interim Commissioner put to the recent meeting of LFEPA's Appointments & Urgency Committee, instead of a proposal to extend the present Commissioner's contract whilst also recruiting a permanent successor?
  • Instant Response Vehicles

    • Reference: 2016/2839
    • Question by: Tony Devenish
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2016
    What progress has been made by the London Fire Brigade in rolling out instant response vehicles?
  • Challenges for the London Fire Brigade (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2016
    Could you just run over it for me - because I thought I had the figures and I did not quite believe them and so I must have misheard - the comparison between the number of incidents between 2007 and 2016 and the number of deaths in fires between 2007 and 2016 and the first attendance response times again? Could you just run over those with me again?
  • Commissioner Recruitment (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Lord Bailey of Paddington
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2016
    I have a question to pick up on my colleague’s point. It strikes me that this recruitment process will limit the people who can be recruited. If you are a senior fire person elsewhere and take this interim role, you will not be able to leave the role you are in. Correct me if I am wrong - and I am prepared to be wrong - but would you not have to convince your own fire authority to loan you to us?
  • Commissioner Recruitment (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Tony Devenish
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2016
    I do echo my colleague’s point. In terms of continuity of personnel, would you not agree with me that when you have senior people doing a job and being accountable, continuity over a period of time is absolutely essential?
  • Subject: 3rd Runway Mitigation

    • Reference: 2015/2492
    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2015
    Your report calls for a 3rd runway at Heathrow to be mitigated by a number of measures including the banning of night flights. Can you confirm that, if those mitigating factors were not introduced then you would no longer support a 3rd runway?
  • Subject: 3rd Runway Mitigation (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Kit Malthouse
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2015
    Kit Malthouse AM MP: Sir Howard, I wanted to ask a little further about night flights. When we last met when you appeared in front of the Assembly, you revealed to me, as somebody who lives under the flight path, this surprising idea that no flights land at Heathrow between 6.00am and 6.20am and that there was a moratorium on that. Since then, Heathrow rather helpfully produces on its website the actual landing times of flights and, of course, there are dozens and dozens of flights that land between 6.00am and 6.20am every single morning, including this morning. Would you...
  • Planning for Britain’s future aviation needs

    • Reference: 2014/2281
    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 18 June 2014
    Do you accept that a key part of planning for Britain’s future aviation needs is ensuring that the hub airport has space to expand further?
  • Independent Aviation Noise Authority (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 18 June 2014
    Richard Tracey AM: Can I question you a bit further on Heathrow? I do not know where you live, Sir Howard. I live in Wandsworth and a lot of my residents, of course, suffer from these early-morning flights you have been talking about. Indeed, Mr Graham was at the meeting a while ago and heard that people from Lambeth were complaining in exactly the same way as we are in Wandsworth. Do I take it that you accept that the current levels of noise, particularly early-morning noise, going into Heathrow are unacceptable for the millions of people who live underneath...
  • Independent Aviation Noise Authority (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 18 June 2014
    Tony Arbour AM: Arising from the last point that Mr Tracey raised, you told us that on the basis of what you already knew it is likely to be true that a third runway is going to generate less noise than two runways. I may say that my constituents in Hounslow and Richmond have frequently heard assertions saying, “More means less”, which has not proved to be so. I wonder if you can tell us on what you base your certainty that there will be a smaller noise footprint from a third runway than there is from the existing two...