Search questions

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 16 January 2008

So you are telling the Assembly that, simply based on the information that you held in your records, on the assumption that all of your records were complete, you were able to come to a conclusion with regard to what Brenda Stern said, that as far as you were concerned there is no case to answer? Would not the obvious thing for you to have done have been to go to the source of the allegations? Is that not an elementary thing to do? Why did you limit your investigation just to the material which you say that you hold?

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 16 January 2008

So you are telling the Assembly that, simply based on the information that you held in your records, on the assumption that all of your records were complete, you were able to come to a conclusion with regard to what Brenda Stern said, that as far as you were concerned there is no case to answer? Would not the obvious thing for you to have done have been to go to the source of the allegations? Is that not an elementary thing to do? Why did you limit your investigation just to the material which you say that you hold?

• Reference: 2001/0216-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

The public sessions of the LDA board concentrate mainly upon incidental discussions about strategies of the LDA and other GLA family members. With the LDA responsible for spending over a quarter of a billion pounds of public money why is it that the Board meets mainly in private? What do you have to hide? .

• Reference: 2001/0223-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

What action is being undertaken to boost South London's drifting economy? .

• Reference: 2001/0226-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

Is London First Centre the right organisation to conduct London's inward investment programme? .

• Reference: 2001/0228-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

The CBI has suggested in a recent report that RDA's lack focus; have little influence over business and are subject to too much meddling from Whitehall. With which of these conclusions do you agree? .

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

Thank you very much, Mr Barlow. Actually I am not terribly encouraged at all. Although the public probably won't even attend, as we all know what happens when we do open public bodies to public attendance, the public would merely like to know that they can come if they wish to come and they probably wouldn't even disturb you. So I'm not sure that there is anything to be frightened of in opening the thing up to the public. But what you have told me is that you believe that you are demonstrating open government but, as I have already...