Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Outer London Regeneration Fund (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 18 May 2011
    Clearly, it is welcome to have a focus on outer London and my colleagues from Sutton and North Cheam are quick off the mark and have already, as it were, put in for some money even though you have not actually told people what the criteria is. But I, too, am concerned about your funding mechanism. It is one thing to take the money off taxpayers and to grant it to outer London boroughs. It is another to borrow because you have to pay the interest on the borrowing and you have to pay the money back. I am a...
  • Greenfield land

    • Reference: 2005/0331-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    How much of the Olympic site will be built on greenfield land? What proportion of the total site does this represent?
  • Recycling

    • Reference: 2005/0334-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Will there be onsite public and commercial collection points for recyclable materials?
  • Business Support

    • Reference: 2005/0377-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Can you update us on the current situation on committed business support for the Games both financial and "in-kind"? (Question Addressed to Keith Mills and Mary Reilly.)
  • Deputy Mayor (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    Are those areas which you have assigned to the Deputy Mayor, such as environment, planning and so forth, set down in writing so that your other staff know to refer to her on those matters rather than to you?
  • Deputy Mayor (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    I do and we do because we are here to understand how this Authority is being run and to hold you to account, but the situation is not fully open and transparent. You have said that you do not now delegate formally when you are out of the country and so forth, but clearly if you were to become permanently incapacitated through death or some other thing then the Act kicks in. However, suppose there was a 9/11 incident here in London and you were trapped underground, mercifully fully alive but unable to function, who would take your place? What...
  • Deputy Mayor (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    Is that set down?
  • Deputy Mayor (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    No, the Act talks about a vacancy in the office.
  • Deputy Mayor (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    I am not saying you need to check, but we, your staff and Londoners need to know how that works because you are clearly holding yourself out.
  • Deputy Mayor (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    Where I am coming from is where we left off last time, two years ago, as Simon (Fletcher) alluded to earlier. Our unanimous party view is that major decisions should be taken by elected politicians and that you should not be delegating major decisions to staff. You should only be delegating to staff the implementation of your major delegations. That was not the case before. Now you are saying that you are in permanent charge electronically wherever you are. I want to understand, and I think Londoners want to understand, how arrangements work when you are not in touch by...