Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Risks associated with cutting police budgets (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: James Cleverly
    • Meeting date: 17 October 2012
    James Cleverly (AM): Thank you, Chair. I had hoped to subtly remind you that my understanding is that Members were here to ask questions of the Mayor and receive answers from the Mayor. Unfortunately, there have been a number of occasions where Labour Members have finished their line of questioning with a statement and you have curtailed the Mayor's attempts to answer the implied questions in those statements. If we are envisaging a change of standing orders where Members are allowed to make parting shots or closing statements, whatever you want to call them, perhaps you could inform the Assembly...
  • Oxford Street speed during Olympics (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: James Cleverly
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2012
    A point of order, Chair.
  • Meeting (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Gareth Bacon MP
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2012
    My colleague Victoria Borwick is very keen to come to her question, which is the next one on the agenda, so I am going to pull my question, Chair. I am withdrawing my question.
  • Step Change and Public Expectations

    • Reference: 2003/0427
    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Given the overwhelming public demand for more community based police patrolling on foot, will the step-change programme prove sufficient to meet public expectations? .
  • Cost of Capital City and Security Functions

    • Reference: 2003/0434
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Has research been undertaken within the MPS to examine if the funding from the Home Office for capital city and security functions fully meets the true cost of providing these services, and if so, what were its conclusions? .
  • London Undergrond Srikes

    • Reference: 2003/0203
    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    How confident are you that you will be able to minimise industrial disputes on the Underground once the system is transferred? .
  • Tube and PPP contracts (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    As a user of the Central Line, I just want to assure you that there was actually no positive element to the Chancery Lane incident. My constituency in Redbridge were absolutely outraged when the decision was made to close down the Hainault loop for further engineering work, after the rest of the Line had reopened. We really did wonder why that work could not have been done during the time that the rest of the Line was closed. I am a bit surprised that Lynne is suggesting this and I would like your assurance that you will not take this...
  • Transfer of the Tube (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Over the last three years we have seen the Mayor carrying out a number of scurrilous personal attacks against senior Underground staff. What have been the consequences of that and how are you going to patch up that relationship?
  • Safer Tube Stations (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Can I ask about some of the deep stations and safety on them? How are you going to ensure passenger safety on the deep stations when Metropolitan Police officers are out of radio contact when they go down there? You do not have to go very deep to be out of contact, such as at St James's which is only two flights of stairs. Also, London Fire Brigade is not contactable below ground in these stations and negotiations have gotten nowhere over the last two and a half years.
  • Staffing (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    First of all, can I welcome your attention to the problems at the east end of the District Line which you have referred to twice this morning? What percentage of the staff that you are about to take on are on temporary contracts? How does that compare to the rest of TfL?