Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • London Legacy Development Corporation’s progress on Healthy Streets

    • Reference: 2019/17039
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 05 September 2019
    What progress are you making in the London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) to deliver Healthy Streets and reach your target for 85 per cent of all journeys to be made by sustainable travel by 2031?
  • Meeting the ambition of the Mayor's Transport Strategy in the Olympic Park

    • Reference: 2018/2067
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 06 September 2018
    Will the London Legacy Development Corporation meet the target in the Mayor's Transport Strategy for 80 per cent of all journeys to be made by public transport, walking and cycling by 2041?
  • Original mode share targets in the Olympic Park

    • Reference: 2018/2068
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 06 September 2018
    In the London Legacy Development Corporation's (LLDC) original 2007 plan for the Olympic Park what was the mode share target and what evidence was this based on?
  • Approving and Planning Foreign Travel (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    I would like to say right up front I am not trying to score any points here, I would just like some progress. I am well aware that my name is on this list of people who have flown on behalf of the Mayor. What weight is given in the planning for whether or not to take trains rather than planes? It is clear that, for example, two people at least have gone to MIPIM [international property event] in Cannes this week, and the LDA automatically booked a flight because apparently you have to book a long way ahead. So...
  • Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    I have one more question if you do not mind. I suppose what I would like to see is some really positive and clear climate change advantage from each trip; if you are going to fly, then get some real advantage from it. That is the sort of offsetting that I could accept. Are you concerned at the fact that flights by GLA people have increased more than threefold since 2001, because this does not fit with the Climate Change Action Plan? Are you going to reconsider this policy?
  • Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    I do understand the rationale for what you are doing. However, if you have this cheaper oil it takes the pressure off in a way from looking for other alternatives, whether it is LPG or bio fuels, and this could actually slow down real progress on climate change adaptation.
  • Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    Are you aware that the Green view of carbon offsetting is that it is actually just like a system of medieval indulgences? You pay the money and you actually still commit the sin.
  • Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    My mistake. Let's talk about Brazil anyway. Brazil has actually got massive amounts of bio fuel from sugar cane. Why hasn't have some sort of arrangement with them, rather than polluting oil?
  • Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    We have been quite critical about your Venezuelan oil deal, and I know the Mayor went to Brazil.
  • Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
    Thank you. The Chair very kindly stopped me leaping in to interrupt you there. It was a fascinating history of the development of the group of major cities. What I really want is when you go to these places, when you go to Los Angeles or John [Ross] goes to Delhi, is there a climate change outcome from those trips? Do you pick up on ideas? For example, in Los Angeles the State of California is actually suing the six largest automobile manufacturers because they have to clear up their mess basically. Is that something London is going to do?