Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Incidence and Nature of Poverty in London (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 19 July 2006
    I won't pursue that, because we have some questions on the employment piece a little later, so I was just going to follow on from Angie (Bray). If the 60% of median income, which as she rightly says is a relative measure, is not merely statistical convenience, because there are exclusion or inequality issues, I wonder whether John could help us in terms of the balance between policy measures that address the absolutes and policy measures that should be reducing inequality, because they clearly are differing strands. If the argument is that we need to do both, how do we...
  • Incidence and Nature of Poverty in London (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 19 July 2006
    Any other thoughts in terms of dealing with this bottom-end problem, and the relativity?
  • Applying experience to London Tube

    • Reference: 2003/0150
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Mr O'Toole your strengths are obviously in contract management looking at your previous business experience. How can what you have learned from your previous experience be best applied to London's Tube network? .
  • Private Infracos (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Just a technical supplementary: you said that the freehold remains with the public sector, with TfL. Can you summarise for us the extent of the leasing arrangements, in terms of the practical day to day ownership and control of the stations? I am interested in this `capturing the development gain" point.