Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

  • Availability of Equipment in a Terrorist Incident

    • Reference: 2006/0325-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Please update us on availability of equipment to cope with potential terrorist incident and training in its use
  • Modernisation Programme (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 09 November 2005
    Good, excellent. I have just two specific questions: one is, we have already mentioned Manchester Square. However I want to mention it again because there are residents there who do feel that they have been deprived of fire cover and they are nervous about the fact that they have lost fire appliances from that area. What can you say to reassure people that their fears are not well-founded?
  • Modernisation Programme

    • Reference: 2005/0430-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 09 November 2005
    Please update us on the success or otherwise of the Modernisation Programme.
  • Availability of equipment in terrorist incident

    • Reference: 2005/0436-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 09 November 2005
    Please update us on availability of equipment to cope with potential terrorist incident and training in its use
  • Transport improvements

    • Reference: 2005/0313-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    The principal, major transport improvements expected before 2012 include: the completion of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link to St Pancras; north and south extensions and upgrades to the East London Line; longer trains, and extensions to the Docklands Light Railway; significant improvements to the transport hubs at Kings Cross/St Pancras and Stratford and the building of the West London tram. The successful bid also means that capacity on the North London Line will be greatly improved. Can you confirm that all these things will occur before 2012?
  • Who will pay for the extra security

    • Reference: 2005/0314-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Tessa Jowell has conceded that the security bill is likely to increase. Who will pay for it?
  • Olympic lottery to divert money from sport?

    • Reference: 2005/0316-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    The Big Lottery Fund, which distributes lottery money, has predicted that grants to causes such as health, education, environmental and volunteer programmes could be reduced by £68m over the next four years, as lottery players switch to the heavily marketed Olympic-themed game. Could this Olympic lottery simply divert monies from other causes - including local sporting developments of which much is made in current lottery propaganda?
  • Freedom of Information

    • Reference: 2005/0317-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Building Design was obliged to obtain information about project funding under Freedom of Information legislation. We too are obliged to resort to FoI on the Olympic opinion polling. We are still chasing the information which was denied to us on grounds that giving it to us would affect public perception of opinion polling. Appreciating that the London Assembly has no role in the Olympic Games and is not even mentioned in the London Olympics Bill, can the Mayor explain who is to have the job of even the most rudeimentary form of scrutiny, looking after London's interests and avoiding the...
  • Immediate gains for sport?

    • Reference: 2005/0318-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    In Singapore, in the final stages of the bidding process, Sebastian Coe promised immediate gains for sport in the UK if London were to be successful. Can these now be quantified?
  • Damage to business from marketing restrictions

    • Reference: 2005/0320-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    The strict provisions in the London Olympics Bill to prevent so-called ambush marketing could make it illegal for a local hotel to advertise rooms for the London Olympics' or a swimwear company to advertise its summer 2012 collection. This is to benefit the profits made by the IOC. Can you confirm whether this is in fact the case, and what is being done to prevent the damage to business locally and nationally in that event?