Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • City Operations Programme (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 20 July 2011
    Do you know how many, if any, privately-sponsored Live sites there will be in London in addition to ones that you are planning to have?
  • Local interests (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 07 December 2005
    I am very grateful for your answer, which I will take not only as an answer but also as a very clear statement of the challenges of getting this right. In the interests of getting to other questions on the agenda, I think we could rest it there, with the promise from you that in the New Year, there will be some clarity about how we are taking this forward, which we can maybe examine again.
  • Access to jobs and training for young people (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 07 December 2005
    To cut this down to a more blunt political point then, there is a risk in the Olympics that if the relationship with the LSCs is not amended or revised or improved in a way that the Mayor is suggesting it should be, then the GLA's view is there is a risk to the Olympics and the delivery of training as part of that?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    A lot of people will look to their local councillors as being people to protect their interests. How do you see that working? I know the local five boroughs have, more or less, agreed a single position on the Olympics and how they work with it. Do you have any problems with any of their requests and proposals?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    I have a feeling that if Angie (Bray) were Mayor of London, she might have problems with it, as well. Leaving that flippant comment to one side, do you see, for example, London Citizens having a continuing involvement with the Olympics?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    It would be very helpful for everyone if those relationships were understood, so that if the DCMS Select Committee makes a point, and the Assembly contradicts it and has a different perspective, there is a coherent response to that, and we understand how the hierarchy works, and how the different interests are being responded to and protected and so on. This could become a rather bureaucratic conversation, but some serious work needs to take place outside of meetings like this. Otherwise, we are going to have lots of very interesting headlines, but maybe not a lot of light shed on...
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Some months ago, in Mary's (Reilly) absence, I had the privilege, as vice chair of the LDA, to be a co-signatory with you of a letter to London Citizens. They are a particular pressure group on behalf of a number of faith groups, in particular. A number of comments were made to them about housing, about training, and so on. How do you see that being followed through in the coming months and years?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Thank you for that. Clearly, it is a bit like the situation with local businesses, that although there may be a range of formal commitments which are very well detailed and set down, individual people and interest groups might have difficulty understanding how they get into the structure of the Olympics. Say your road is stopped up, because there is some work taking place, or some development happens at the end of your street for the Olympics, and you do not really understand who to go to, or why it is happening. How is that mechanism going to work?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    One final question, and I can ask this by posing a possible answer, I suppose: who should hold the Olympics to account? Potentially, the Olympics board holds it to account; the ODA holds it to account; the LDA holds it to account; and the London Assembly and each of the individual boroughs might consider they have to. There is a Select Committee of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) which might want to, as well. Is there potentially a real messy soup of accountability, out of which everyone will want a soundbite, but no one will actually wrestle...
  • Leaside Regeneration

    • Reference: 2005/0336-1
    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    What is the role, if any, of Leaside Regeneration in ensuring that the Olympics 'join up' with local communities?