Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Hidden Costs on 169 Union Street

    • Reference: 2006/0322-1
    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    The new Head Quarters project has hidden costs which were not included in the original costing e.g. security and insurance at the new site. What other costs are yet to emerge into the public domain?
  • Relations with the Fire Brigades Union

    • Reference: 2006/0324-1
    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Please update us on current relations with the Fire Brigades Union.
  • Availability of Equipment in a Terrorist Incident

    • Reference: 2006/0325-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Please update us on availability of equipment to cope with potential terrorist incident and training in its use
  • London Safety Action Plan

    • Reference: 2006/0328-1
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    LFEPA Members will shortly be considering the draft London Safety Action Plan for 2007/2008, how do you anticipate that this will accelerate modernisation of London Fire Brigade?
  • Manchester Square Fire Station

    • Reference: 2006/0329-1
    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Local residents have put forward a new proposal for Manchester Square Fire Station in which the Metropolitan Police would share the station, thus reducing the costs to LFEPA. What is LFEPA's reaction to this proposal?
  • Listing of Fire Stations (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 09 November 2005
    It sounds as though it is a major constraint on the modernisation of the service. I am just wondering if you have done any lobbying with the relevant parties because it has always been the impression that I have had, with English Heritage certainly, that they have the listing without the financial responsibilities and it is something they need to be more receptive to.
  • London Fire Safety Plan (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 09 November 2005
    That is very encouraging, because at the time, certainly from our side, we said we believed it would have this effect but if it proved not to, we were prepared to come back and reconsider.
  • London Fire Safety Plan (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 09 November 2005
    I am intending to be helpful, in that my question ' whether it was great minds thinking alike or monkeys with typewriters ' is more or less the same as Mike Tuffrey's, and it is the next question on the Order Paper. Sally Hamwee (Chair): Just so we all know where we are, is this a supplementary? John Biggs (AM): It is a supplementary but it might mean we can forgo my question after this one. Obviously there was a lot of heat and light in Tower Hamlets about the loss of the fire engine. Most of my question has...
  • London Fire Safety Plan (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 09 November 2005
    I am perhaps expressing myself badly. I think what I was told by one of my residents was that the reason for the excellent response time on 7 July was in part luck because we had fire officers returning from an earlier incident, which meant they were they returning and free to go straight out. I do not know the truth of that; I am just putting that point to you because it was put to me and I wonder whether that was part of it. My other question to Valerie (Shawcross) is that I hear what you say about...
  • London Fire Safety Plan (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 09 November 2005
    You have that list in front of you with attendance times, which tells us that Westminster is fourth as predicted. Is Havering last as predicted?