Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 1

Status

Year

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Can I just understand the numbers a bit better. You talked about the £56 million that was all that was committed up to now but we have got £85.6 million in the budgets for this current year. Is that £85.6 million funded or is there now more in this current year, 2011/12, than that number?

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Can I just understand the numbers a bit better. You talked about the £56 million that was all that was committed up to now but we have got £85.6 million in the budgets for this current year. Is that £85.6 million funded or is there now more in this current year, 2011/12, than that number?

  • Question and Answer Session: Mayoral Development Corporation (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    In the minute or two left I do not have the time to debate the sweep of the abolition of the Greater London Council (GLC) because it was too interventionist, the strategic role this body was meant to have and now a much more interventionist, but I think many of us round here would be very concerned at planning powers being taken off boroughs as a way of doing business. First question then, very quickly, do you agree that, if we are to go down this MDC route, there should be a very tight set of objectives and time limited...

  • South London Rail Services

    • Reference: 2007/0175-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    What can TfL do in the short term to make it more likely that the inadequate commuter rail services in South London are improved?

  • South London Rail Services (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Your betting would be that the re-tendering will proceed on that timescale?

  • South London Rail Services (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    When will that come to a head?

  • South London Rail Services (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    So, again, the timescales for those discussions?

  • South London Rail Services (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    You are aware that there is a lot of unhappiness about the potential closure of the shuttle between Victoria and London Bridge as a result of the Thameslink work. Rather than go into that, will you just give us your reassurance that you know that local opposition to that is very high?

  • South London Rail Services (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Can I just ask you to be a bit more specific on a couple of those points. The East London Line extension phase two, which, as I understand it, is a relatively small sum of money by the standard of these things, for really just a mile or so of extra track; at what point are we going to know about that? I appreciate that, as it were, warm words are being spoken, but just pin that down for me.

  • South London Rail Services (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    In relation to the re-tendering of the Southern Railways contract, nobody is saying that that will be handed over to TfL in the way that what you are now calling the Overground was, but, as I understand it, again, there are warm words that the Mayor and TfL are being consulted and so forth. Can you, again, be more precise about TfL's involvement in that re-tendering?