Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Question and Answer Session: Mayoral Development Corporation (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    The Mayoral Development Corporation will presumably have to be in conformity with the London Plan?

  • Question and Answer Session: Mayoral Development Corporation (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Jennette Arnold (Deputy Chair): Yes, Chair, thank you. I want to take you back to the area that John was asking you about. Thank you for welcoming the fact that there were some disappointments regarding the LDDC in the fact that it did not deal adequately with the social legacy. What assurances will we have from an MDC to get us the social legacy that is so required within this area? Sir Simon Milton (Deputy Mayor and Chief of Staff): The assurance you have, Jennette, is that the whole purpose of setting this up is to help achieve the convergence...

  • Question and Answer Session: Mayoral Development Corporation (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    In the minute or two left I do not have the time to debate the sweep of the abolition of the Greater London Council (GLC) because it was too interventionist, the strategic role this body was meant to have and now a much more interventionist, but I think many of us round here would be very concerned at planning powers being taken off boroughs as a way of doing business. First question then, very quickly, do you agree that, if we are to go down this MDC route, there should be a very tight set of objectives and time limited...

  • One-way Systems

    • Reference: 2007/0155-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Would turning back the majority of gyratory systems in London to two-way operation help you achieve the targets for walking/cycling set out in your document Transport 2025?

  • TfL Budget

    • Reference: 2007/0164-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    How will you find the additional resources required to improve walking and cycling infrastructure in the face of pressures on funding arising from Crossrail and Metronet?

  • Financial Pressures

    • Reference: 2007/0172-1
    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    The collapse of Metronet and the demands of the Crossrail project threaten severe strain on TfL's finances. Do you believe that either of these challenges puts projects and/or fares at risk?

  • South London Rail Services

    • Reference: 2007/0175-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    What can TfL do in the short term to make it more likely that the inadequate commuter rail services in South London are improved?

  • Traffic Speeds

    • Reference: 2007/0178-1
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    How will you address the falling traffic speeds within the Central Congestion Charging zone?

  • Re-zoning

    • Reference: 2007/0180-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Can TfL use its influence to press for the rezoning of Zone 6 rail stations like Kingston and Surbiton where 20,000 annual season ticket holders face fare increases of £400?

  • Stoke Newington Gyratory II

    • Reference: 2007/0187-1
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Do you agree with a recent report in the Evening Standard that placed the Stoke Newington Gyratory amongst the top 12 most dangerous Gyratories?