Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Question and Answer Session: London Legacy Development Corporation (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2023
    Len Duvall OBE AM: On the Stadium, since you have both been in position, we have stabilised the costs around the Stadium. We understand more about what the Stadium can do or cannot do. You have conversations with all the tenants and particularly you have opened up a relationship with the anchor tenant, but there are still legal issues and they are about the contracts that you have between your good selves. What is the future of the Stadium? What does that look like over the coming years? What are the potential options around that? Could you just give us...
  • Question and Answer Session: London Legacy Development Corporation (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2023
    Len Duvall OBE AM: Let us go back to real estate around the Stadium. Most of that would have been part of the open space and parkland. There are no options and nothing under your plans that you would build on that open space element that is included in your development area.
  • Supplementary [4]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 05 September 2019
    Len Duvall OBE AM: Thank you very much. Can we go back to the Moore Stephens report? Can you just remind us of the steps that you have taken briefly since they highlighted that your organisation was taking most of the risks around the Stadium, both in capital and in terms of operating cost?
  • New Chief Executive update (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 06 September 2018
    Len Duvall AM: Thank you very much. Can you turn to the stadium and the Moore Stephens report [ Olympic Stadium Review ]? Can you give us an update on how you have acted upon the findings of that report? When it was published [in November 2017] it talked particularly about the estimated projected losses. I think it quoted between £10 million and £20 million a year. Is that still the figure you are working to and is it still an objective to get that figure down? I do not mind who takes it.
  • TfL - past and future (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 08 June 2016
    Len Duvall AM: Mr Mayor, in the past you have said that you would wish to see the increase in the proportion of TfL’s budget spent on cycling. Your predecessor planned to spend about 1.44% in this budget year. The Assembly has done a scrutiny report that said, really, it should be up to 2% to bring us in line with other pro-cycling cities. What do you think? What do you hope to devote to cycling by the end of your first term?
  • Reducing traffic in London (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 08 June 2016
    Len Duvall AM: Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr Mayor, for clarifying in answer to Assembly Member Kurten’s question that your ambitions for modal shift will lead to reductions in that traffic aspect. I want to bring you back to a question around devolution. I, like you, share the aspirations of devolution, but there are limitations to it. Your ambition for Healthy Streets, if we devolved some of the TfL budget for that and left it to the boroughs, would not happen, Mr Mayor. Would you agree with me that there are limits to devolution of those issues if...