Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 1

Status

Year

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [20]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    First of all a specific point: there are standard phrases which occur in a number of paragraphs of the review, one that the review has identified weaknesses, in effect, in procedures which are now being addressed and, second, the point is made, I think, on three or four occasions about the way in which the Mayoral advisory role is conducted in respect of programme delivery should be clarified. What specific steps are you taking to carry forward those conclusions?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [39]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Mr Lewis, I take it you had read the report?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [40]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    That is right. Mr Lewis, who drew up and authorised the issue of the press release?

  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    First of all a specific point: there are standard phrases which occur in a number of paragraphs of the review, one that the review has identified weaknesses, in effect, in procedures which are now being addressed and, second, the point is made, I think, on three or four occasions about the way in which the Mayoral advisory role is conducted in respect of programme delivery should be clarified. What specific steps are you taking to carry forward those conclusions?

  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Mr Lewis, I take it you had read the report?

  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    That is right. Mr Lewis, who drew up and authorised the issue of the press release?

  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [28]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Very well, Mr Lewis. Why did you then put out a press release which is put in these terms, in the light of what Mr Travers has just told us and in the light of the report which I take it you had read: 'Allegations of LDA corruption false'? Referring to the allegations in the first paragraph it says, 'The review finds these to be unfounded'? It does not do anything of the kind, does it?

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Very well, Mr Lewis. Why did you then put out a press release which is put in these terms, in the light of what Mr Travers has just told us and in the light of the report which I take it you had read: 'Allegations of LDA corruption false'? Referring to the allegations in the first paragraph it says, 'The review finds these to be unfounded'? It does not do anything of the kind, does it?

  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Two short points, if I might, on that. Are you saying then, Neale, can I be clear, that the developments which are currently proposed are not dependent, for example, therefore, on the extension of the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) down to Rainham?

  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [18]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Finally, can I take if from what you said that the Mayor will continue to oppose any nationalisation, in effect, of the Section 106 legal agreement monies through a national Planning Gain Supplement (PGS).