Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

Meeting type

Organisation 1

Question by

Status

Year

  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Can I just ask Mary about the LDA's perspective. The Memorandum of Understanding has been renegotiated. We have heard the assurances today about budgets but we clearly do not know what the position will be when we get the final outturn on everything. Have you got any concerns that the Government might withdraw revenue for support grant, for example, from the GLA to compensate for any cost overruns?

  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [33]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    In the event that there are major cost overruns, you have not put this into your risk assessment of the project, that we would lose money as an authority from the Government in direct relation to any cost overruns that take place?

  • London Youth Offer (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Perhaps you could just give us the funding. Just pass the funding straight on.

  • London Youth Offer (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    It seems like a very good scheme. Can I ask how this funding can be accessed by local communities?

  • London Fashion Week (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    Can I encourage you then? Perhaps you can encourage a different sort of show, because after all the average size of the women in this country is a size 16, so more Rubenesque, can I say, than Picasso or Modigliani. My colleague, on my right here (Tony Arbour AM), actually has declared that he likes the Rubenesque shape rather than the skinny shape. So, can I encourage you perhaps to sponsor one of these. It is lovely. Some of us are really a bit more rounded than others and so it would be really nice to see that sort of...

  • London Fashion Week (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    Sorry, Ms. Reilly, with all due respect, I do not think that Ms. Doocey's question asked any of that, and I do not think you have answered it, because I do not think you have actually referred to the issue that she raises in her last sentence. I would be most obliged if you would refer to that issue.

  • Olympics (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    That is 9,000, of which we have got 23 per cent secured.

  • Olympics (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    I am just looking at the aspects that we have already talked about, barriers to employment and worklessness and here are 2,000 jobs that are real, actually in place, that are under threat.

  • LDA Project Funding (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    Actually `dormant' I understand means that a company is not trading and that is not the same definition which you have just used. Not trading means you are not trading.

  • LDA Project Funding (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    OK, can I ask the question another way then? Would you give a grant to a company which is effectively not trading because it has got no business of any size? Would you give it to such an organisation which could hardly be called a company?