Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 1

Status

Year

  • Abandoned Cooler tube proposals

    • Reference: 2007/0267-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    How much has been spent on the proposed scheme which has now been abandoned?

  • Low Emission Zone

    • Reference: 2007/0271-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    How much is it costing to set up the Low Emission Zone and what are the estimated annual running costs?

  • Freedom of Information

    • Reference: 2007/0272-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Are you satisfied with TfL's handling of Freedom of Information matters? Correspondence between my constituent and TfL (TFL reference CCFOI 1189) about public opinion surveys (regarding Congestion Charging and Greenwich) appears to show a very slow process.

  • Abandoned Cooler tube proposals (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Absolutely, so it is going to go ahead? This idea that it had been abandoned is not true?

  • Crossrail v LDA (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Yes, you are absolutely right. London generates an enormous amount of wealth - according to the London Chamber of Commerce about £13 - £20 billion - which is then taken by the Government and used to subsidise the rest of the country, if not Scotland. We can certainly do with more money. As far as Crossrail is concerned, the Mayor has said that is probably the most important project, even more important than the Olympics. Nevertheless, the Government still found themselves with a shortfall of over £300 million and turned to the City to stump up yet more money in...

  • Metronet (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    You mentioned in the first part of your answer to Darren [Johnson] that the PPP was commercially advantageous to Metronet. If that is an unfair contract, does that not put TfL in a powerful position to renegotiate the contract?

  • DLR and London Underground

    • Reference: 2006/0541-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    Why is there no information about the running of the DLR on London Underground stations in the same way as there is information about other lines and stations?

  • Bus Tickets

    • Reference: 2006/0543-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    Are you satisfied with the working of the ticket machines at bus stops?

  • Low Emission Zone - Objectives

    • Reference: 2006/0545-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    The TfL website states that one of the two objectives of the proposed Low Emission Zone is to move London closer "to achieving national and EU air quality objectives for 2010". Is there any difference between national air quality objectives and those stipulated by the EU?

  • Low Emission Zone - Public Consultation Process

    • Reference: 2006/0546-1
    • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    What is the total budget for the Low Emission Zone public consultation process? Please can you supply a breakdown of how this is being spent, in particular, how much is being spent on media advertising and which media outlets were used?