Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • London and Covid-19 Restrictions (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Lord Bailey of Paddington
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2021
    Shaun Bailey AM: Thank you, Chair. Good morning, all. Can I address my first question to Deputy Mayor Agrawal, please? When restrictions are easing and are being pulled back, what work is being done to prepare London to reopen, by the Mayor’s Office and by your office as well, please?
  • Effectiveness of the LEAP

    • Reference: 2019/11381
    • Question by: Susan Hall
    • Meeting date: 06 June 2019
    How would you rate the effectiveness of the LEAP?
  • Supporting Economic Growth

    • Reference: 2019/11382
    • Question by: Leonie Cooper
    • Meeting date: 06 June 2019
    Since the LEAP was created, what actions have you taken to support economic growth and job creation in the capital?
  • Underspends in community and environmental projects

    • Reference: 2019/11380
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 06 June 2019
    Could you explain why there are significant underspends in your support for community and environmental projects?
  • Chairman's Question to Guests (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 06 February 2015
    Nicky Gavron AM: Sir Edward, thank you very much for that introduction. The big headline out of this Plan is that the Mayor’s target is not high enough to meet the housing that London needs. It does not even take the target that is given in his own evidence. We have a housing crisis. Why are you content to move forward with a Plan that does not meet London’s housing need?
  • Chairman's Question to Guests (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Tom Copley
    • Meeting date: 06 February 2015
    Tom Copley AM: I want to move on to talk about affordable housing. Would a London-wide percentage target for affordable housing be more effective at delivering the homes that Londoners need the most?
  • Chairman's Question to Guests (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 06 February 2015
    Navin Shah AM: Good morning, Sir Edward. In your introduction, you made a reference to the long-term future. Can we look at that in the context of safeguarding London’s skyline? Can you tell me, please, what policies in the altered London Plan could be used to ensure that in the short and long term we do not end up with out-of-character buildings like 1 Merchant Square popping up across London?
  • Chairman's Question to Guests (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 06 February 2015
    Richard Tracey AM: Thank you, Chairman. Could I just pursue you a little further on the line of questioning you were receiving from Steve O’Connell about parking in outer London? Are you specifically delineating what is ‘outer London’ and what is ‘inner London’? What bothers me is that sometimes it seems that TfL, when commenting on planning applications, tries to impose the rather stricter inner London format on outer London boroughs. As you said, we do definitely need more scope for residential parking in outer London.
  • Chairman's Question to Guests (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 06 February 2015
    Murad Qureshi AM: Sir Edward, can I bring up the particular issue of subterranean basement developments? Last night I heard from residents of Bayswater that they have had 15 of these developments in the last 18 months. It has caused sinkholes, flooding and structural damage to properties. It is a problem not only in the City of Westminster but in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, in Hammersmith and Fulham and I understand in other boroughs in north London as well. We also unanimously passed a motion in March proposing that some limits should be made on these excessive...
  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Can I just ask Mary about the LDA's perspective. The Memorandum of Understanding has been renegotiated. We have heard the assurances today about budgets but we clearly do not know what the position will be when we get the final outturn on everything. Have you got any concerns that the Government might withdraw revenue for support grant, for example, from the GLA to compensate for any cost overruns?