Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 1

Status

Year

  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Two short points, if I might, on that. Are you saying then, Neale, can I be clear, that the developments which are currently proposed are not dependent, for example, therefore, on the extension of the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) down to Rainham?

  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [18]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Finally, can I take if from what you said that the Mayor will continue to oppose any nationalisation, in effect, of the Section 106 legal agreement monies through a national Planning Gain Supplement (PGS).

  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [28]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    My apologies for not having been in at the beginning of the conversation, Neale; I was actually in the Thames Gateway meeting some residents in Bexley earlier on. I just wanted to take up one of the points that was raised and that is this: the clear view of all the partners, both in London Thames Gateway and in Essex and in Kent, is that you will only be able to deliver sustainable communities in the Gateway if the infrastructure is put in before the housing. There seems to be no evidence of that. Given that Crossrail is likely to...

  • Transport Safer Neighbourhood Teams (2) (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    I am sure it is right to do that because, leaving aside the question of the overground railway simply because they work on the Tube and the buses. Clearly, we all know that after 10.00 pm is very often one of the times when people most want to see a visible uniformed presence. I am wondering, given this difficulty which I hope can be resolved, and given the fact we have had to go through this sort of negotiation, would it perhaps in retrospect have been better to advise the Mayor to put in the money for fully warranted officers...

  • Transport Safer Neighbourhood Teams (2) (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Thank you very much. Can I come back to Lord Tope's questions about shift patterns and so on for PCSOs and in particular in relation to their work on the overground railway. You will remember that there was some discussion of this at the September MPA meeting and the particular concern I have is that at the moment of course y it involves PCSOs finishing at 10.00 pm. Tim Godwin (Assistant Commissioner) told the Police Authority on 28 September that if they worked after 10.00 pm in the evening, staff would be entitled to an increase in salary which was...

  • Terrorism Threat to London (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    As I understand it, your assessment is that the risk, whilst not to be overstated, nonetheless remains real and continuing?

  • Terrorism Threat to London (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    Certainly nothing has changed in recent weeks or months to alter that?

  • Terrorism Threat to London (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    I think you share that information with Government?

  • Terrorism Threat to London (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    I am sure with the Chair of the [Metropolitan Police]Authority?

  • Terrorism Threat to London (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    Absolutely, and I imagine also with the Mayor?