Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • South West Trains (2)

    • Reference: 2007/0262-1
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    What is Transport for London doing to speed up plans to make the former Eurostar platforms at London Waterloo operational as soon as possible?
  • South London Rail Services (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    You are very proud that you have taken over the former Silverlink North London line and clearly there are going to be substantial improvements there, but the vast bulk of the improvements that you are proposing to make to the line itself, are towards the east. Can you tell me what work you have done in considering extending the services of that line to the south west.
  • South London Rail Services (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    My office has been in discussion with South West Trains and they would be perfectly happy for ' clearly because it is extra custom ' their tracks to be used. Has there been discussion over dual use of tracks for any further extension of the line really anywhere in London, not just in this particular patch?
  • Fare Evasion (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Without getting into the merits or otherwise of bendy buses, obviously one of the clear concerns is that the rear portion of the buses is not monitored. Is there a consideration now then that you would concentrate RPIs and suchlike on such routes, where fare evasion is particularly a problem?
  • Fare Evasion (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    The reason I raised that is that the number 18 bus route that runs through my constituency carries two million passengers a year, or thereabouts. In a recent exercise over 100 people were caught in an hour, without having paid a proper fare. That suggests that anecdotal evidence that people just do not bother paying if they get on the rear portion of those buses is borne out by reality, and if there is a concentration on routes such as that, it must reduce the amount of money that is evaded. Would you not agree that is a useful way...
  • Abandoned Cooler tube proposals (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Have you got any idea when we will actually hear when this will all happen?
  • Abandoned Cooler tube proposals (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    In the spring. Is that the spring of next year or 2009 or later?
  • Abandoned Cooler tube proposals (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    One of the considerations that I would like you to take away, and I do not expect an answer now, is about the timings on the Metropolitan Line trains on the signboards that seem to have disappeared because no one can rely on them. The fact that trains are due to appear is listed now, but without the actual time delay and it appears because of frequent breakdowns and problems that we have got on the rolling stock, that that is what is happening and a lot of commuters are concerned about that.
  • Abandoned Cooler tube proposals (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    I listened to your comments about the requirement to do the Metropolitan Line, which runs right the way through my constituency. Obviously one of the concerns that most people have is that, in some way, shape or form, the various different station upgrades and improvements to the line are going to be delayed or even worse, postponed. Can you give us a guarantee now about when the work will be carried out, or whether that will be included within this Metronet review?
  • £25 congestion charge (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    I asked the Mayor about the situation with Malden Rushett, and I was joined in that by my colleague Bob Neill who says that he has similar problems in his constituency, where the LEZ (Low Emission Zone) does not actually follow the Greater London boundary. We have farmers who have farms split by the Low Emission Zone. The Mayor was asked whether he would look at that and alter the boundary. The Mayor said he would not. Would you care to advise the Mayor, when you next see him, that it would be sensible to do that?