Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Light Bulb Amnesty (1)

    • Reference: 2008/0196
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 30 January 2008
    According to his latest Decision List, the Mayor spent £245,000 on the recent 'Light Bulb Amnesty' (£118,000 by the GLA and £127,000 by TfL). How much money was spent on marketing and publicity, and how much was spent on the light bulbs themselves?
  • Light Bulb Amnesty (3)

    • Reference: 2008/0198
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 30 January 2008
    How many traditional light bulbs were exchanged in the 'Light Bulb Amnesty', and how were these disposed of?
  • South West Trains (1)

    • Reference: 2007/0261-1
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Large parts of my constituency have no tube access and thus my constituents who commute are almost completely reliant on train travel. Does the Commissioner believe that South-West London is getting a fair deal on public transport and is Transport for London doing enough to help my constituents?
  • Transport and the sub-regions

    • Reference: 2006/1772
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 12 July 2006
    In your Draft Alterations to the London Plan, the sub regions are heavily reliant upon new and upgraded transport links, can you please state how you expect the sub-regions to cope with the annual increase in housing/population when transport links such as Crossrail 1, the East London Line extension and upgrades to the underground will not be completed for a few years to come?
  • Remits of the ODA and LDA in regard of the 2012 Olympic Games

    • Reference: 2006/0115-1
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    Can you clarify the precise remits of the ODA and LDA?
  • School Social Mix

    • Reference: 2004/1601
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
    Following on from question number 1393/2004, should not the priority be to ensure adequate schooling is provided locally before embarking on social engineering?
  • Response to Assembly Member Correspondence by TfL

    • Reference: 2003/0867
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
    Will you explain why Transport for London finds it difficult to reply to correspondence from Assembly Members eg A) Letter from Tony Arbour sent 5/11/01 on footbridge at Kew, despite more than 50 reminders? B) Letter from Roger Evans of 15/10/02 re Mr Granger ref 198/PS? C) Letter from Andrew Pelling of 13/12/03 ref AP 3065, about improvements to the junction at Selsdon town centre? .
  • SERAS Consultation

    • Reference: 2002/0384
    • Question by: Victor Anderson
    • Meeting date: 16 July 2002
    Is the Mayor satisfied that, in its work on SERAS, the LDA is complying with Section 373 of the GLA Act, which requires it to have regard to the Mayor's environmental strategies? .
  • Reduction in congestion

    • Reference: 2002/0391
    • Question by: Victor Anderson
    • Meeting date: 16 July 2002
    What is the significance of the Mayor's adoption of a target of a 15% reduction in traffic congestion in central London in the "Key Performance Measures" section of the Draft London Plan (page 285) when in his Transport Strategy he set a target (reaffirmed on page 191 of the Draft London Plan) of 15% reduction in central London not of the amount of congestion, but of weekday road traffic itself? .
  • Shareholders in the CIT Group

    • Reference: 2002/0127
    • Question by: Victor Anderson
    • Meeting date: 27 March 2002
    Will the Mayor list the principal shareholders in the CIT Group (the owners of City Hall)? .