Search questions

• Reference: 2023/4809
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 21 December 2023

Constituents in Ealing have expressed their consternation over the council decision to fell trees in the area, apparently without consultation or even any reasonable attempt to forewarn local residents. Can you explain why there is no representation from Greater London councils on the London Urban Forest Partnership, and do you consider this cause for concern?

• Reference: 2023/4798
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 21 December 2023

How will you ensure that recommendations of the climate resilience review lead to gender and intersectionality inclusive climate adaptation measures for London?

• Reference: 2023/4807
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 21 December 2023

Will each of the Retrofit Delivery Model options currently being developed be made publicly available and, if so, when?

• Reference: 2023/4808
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 21 December 2023

Could you provide information about: a) how many people have contacted the Energy Advice London service in the past year, and b) how many individual home upgrade measures, broken down by type, have been installed as a result?

• Reference: 2023/4385
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2023/3956, in which you said the final delivery reports for the Warmer Homes 3 programme are being compiled. Could you provide more information on when these will be published?

• Reference: 2023/4386
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question MQ 2023/3956, in which you said the final delivery reports for the Warmer Homes 3 programme are being compiled. When you publish this data, could you also provide a breakdown of how much was spent on a) administration and project management (for both the GLA and RetrofitWorks), b) assessment of homes, c) installation labour, and d) materials for installation?

• Reference: 2023/4387
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2023/3953, in which you said the drop-off in funding for Phase 4 of the Warmer Homes programme was: “due in main to central government stopping the LAD funding stream for households heated by gas.” Could you provide the: a) number, and b) percentage of low-income households in London on the gas grid, which no longer have access to this funding?

• Reference: 2023/4388
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2023/3954, in which you said, “my funding will aim to install retrofit measures on up to 178 low-income households”. In the process of making this forecast, what steps did you take to consider alternative funding mechanisms to the individual grant funding approach, which may have enabled you to upgrade more homes through economies of scale?

• Reference: 2023/4389
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to 2023/3954, in which you said you aimed to install 580 homes using HUG2 funding, and 178 homes using GLA funding. What estimates did you make of the anticipated costs to reach these delivery estimates, broken down by a) administration and project management (for both the GLA and RetrofitWorks), b) assessment of homes, c) installation labour, and d) materials for installation?

• Reference: 2023/4390
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2023/3957, in which you said, “as part of the development of a new Retrofit Delivery Model a range of stakeholders will be consulted.” Will you provide a list of which stakeholders the Partnership Board: a) have engaged, and b) plan to engage, during the development of the Retrofit Delivery Model?