Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

  • Warmer Homes for children, older or disabled Londoners

    • Reference: 2023/4815
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 21 December 2023
    The London Assembly Environment Committee 2019 report, Keeping out the chill: fixing London’s cold, damp and mouldy homes, recommended that your Warmer Homes programme evaluation include an assessment of how many children, older or disabled people were reached through the programme. Expanding upon your answer to my question 2019/20728, could you share in the second and third rounds how many children, older or disabled people were helped through the Warmer Homes programme?
  • Tyre pollution from tight U-turns

    • Reference: 2023/4405
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 16 November 2023
    A constituent has contacted me about the Transport for London (TfL) requirement that all taxis must have a tighter turning circle than standard cars, and has asked if you could produce evidence-based analysis of the tyre pollution created by taxis completing tight U-turns in comparison to standard cars performing U-turns?
  • Green Finance Fund funding (3)

    • Reference: 2023/3960
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 12 October 2023
    Thank you for your answer to question 2023/3079, in which you said the loans made by the Green Finance Fund will be financed with “GLA’s working capital and reserve cash balances that it holds from time to time”. Were these reserve cash balances and working capital available in 2020, 2021 and 2022, and would such internal borrowing have been permitted in those years?
  • Solar Together Website (1)

    • Reference: 2023/3346
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2023
    At the time when people were signing up to Solar Together London, the following words were on the London.gov.uk GLA website; “the Solar Together London scheme will group purchase solar panels at a very competitive price on your behalf and oversee the high-quality installation of them by installers who have passed our rigorous vetting process”, on the page which introduced the Solar Together scheme. They have since been removed. Do you think they gave the public a false and misleading picture of the way the scheme operated?
  • Solar Together Website (2)

    • Reference: 2023/3347
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2023
    At the time when people were signing up to Solar Together London, the following words were on the London.gov.uk GLA website, on the page which introduced the Solar Together scheme; “the Solar Together London scheme will group purchase solar panels at a very competitive price on your behalf and oversee the high-quality installation of them by installers who have passed our rigorous vetting process.” They have since been removed. Do you think members of the public reading these words on the GLA website will have taken them to mean that the GLA was overseeing the installation by installers who had...
  • Solar Together Website (3)

    • Reference: 2023/3348
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2023
    At the time when people were signing up to Solar Together London, the following words were on the London.gov.uk GLA website, on the page which introduced the Solar Together scheme; “the Solar Together London scheme will group purchase solar panels at a very competitive price on your behalf and oversee the high-quality installation of them by installers who have passed our rigorous vetting process.” They have since been removed. Why were they removed?
  • Solar Together Website (4)

    • Reference: 2023/3349
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2023
    At the time when people were signing up to Solar Together London, the following words were on the London.gov.uk GLA website, on the page which introduced the Solar Together scheme; “the Solar Together London scheme will group purchase solar panels at a very competitive price on your behalf and oversee the high-quality installation of them by installers who have passed our rigorous vetting process.” They have since been removed. On which date were they removed?
  • Solar Together Contract (1)

    • Reference: 2023/3350
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2023
    You have backed this scheme and therefore Londoners put their trust into iChoosr who have let many customers down. What are you doing personally to reassure affected customers?
  • Solar Together Contract (2)

    • Reference: 2023/3351
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2023
    Will you be more involved with future phases of Solar Together to ensure that issues of this scale do not occur again?
  • Solar Together Contract (3)

    • Reference: 2023/3352
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2023
    Will there be any contractual changes to your relationship with iChoosr so that the GLA can be a data handler and also involved in the process of vetting potential suppliers?