Search questions

• Reference: 2016/0982
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

In answer to question 2016/0638 you restate what you told me last November, that 'the GLA does not hold information on properties sold through the Right to Buy', and only holds information on replacement homes you have funded. Please explain, therefore, how you were able to state at the January MQT when challenged by me about replacement homes that that 'we have been able to produce a ratio of 3:1 rather than 1:1'?

• Reference: 2016/0983
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

In January you told me that you have received Right to Buy underspends by three boroughs. Which boroughs were they, and how much did you receive from each one?

• Reference: 2016/0984
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

In answer to question 2016/0637 you told me that the GLA conducts an annual compliance audit of schemes completed under its affordable housing programmes. Have there been any cases where actual rents specified in the tenancy agreement for the home have differed from the rents agreed with the GLA?

• Reference: 2016/0985
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

Does the annual compliance audit of schemes completed under its affordable housing programmes take account of the tenure and rent levels entailed in the original section 106 agreements?

• Reference: 2016/0986
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

When the GLA considers applications from registered social landlords for affordable housing grants and loans for specific schemes, do officers cross-check the application's details with planning applications, in order to assess whether the RSL is meeting the conditions agreed in the section 106 agreement?

• Reference: 2016/0990
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

According to Investment and Performance Board papers, you have deferred the decision about the future of the National Sports Centre in Crystal Palace for the next mayoralty. Given widespread public interest and concern about the NSC's future, why haven't you issued a public announcement about this?

• Reference: 2016/0991
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

What repairs and maintenance work has the GLA undertaken or funded at the National Sports Centre in the past year?

• Reference: 2016/0992
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

What repairs and maintenance work is planned for the National Sports Centre in the coming financial year? Constituents have raised concerns with me about poor lighting (in spite of recent repairs), parking and the state of the astroturf pitch which a number of hockey clubs have complained about.

• Reference: 2016/0993
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

The decision not to open hard-covered parking areas around the National Sports Centre has led to more cars and coaches parking on grassed areas over the winter, turning many of these banks into badly rutted mud pits. What action will you take to restore these grassed areas, and will you investigate other ways to provide more suitable car parking facilities in the short term while longer term options are explored?

• Reference: 2016/1008
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

According to Capital & Counties Properties PLC (Capco) year end results to the London Stock Exchange (audited preliminary results for the year ended 31 December 2015), Capco revealed they are 'monitoring intelligence on activist groups' and have categorised 'public interest or activist group' as a risk to their business. As a public body, should TfL be in partnership with a corporation implying that residents opposing the demolition of their homes, the exhibition industry, local businesses, public figures from both the political and music industry and any parties opposed to the demolition of the Earl's Court exhibition centres should be 'monitored'?