Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

  • Personal Service Companies

    • Reference: 2015/4253
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 16 December 2015
    How many temporary employees at Transport for London are currently engaged via employment agencies through their own Personal Service Companies?
  • Name-blind recruitment

    • Reference: 2015/4254
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 16 December 2015
    Please state what the policy is towards the use of name-blind recruitment for each organisation within the GLA Group.
  • Voter registration

    • Reference: 2015/3595
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 18 November 2015
    Following the recent House of Lords vote on the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013 (Transitional Provisions) Order 2015 have you had any discussions with the Greater London Returning Officer to clarify what steps are being taken to ensure that Londoners are aware of the changes taking place to the electoral register and the steps people can take to ensure they are on the electoral register before the 1st December 2015?
  • Mayoral correspondence

    • Reference: 2015/3132
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 21 October 2015
    Please publish a table showing how many items of correspondence from Assembly Members have not been answered within (1) 20-25 working days, (2) 26-30 working days, (3) 31-40 working days, and (4) more than 41 working days.
  • Extension of Childcare Hours

    • Reference: 2015/3150
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 21 October 2015
    What assessment have you made of the impact the extension of free childcare hours will have on childcare places following reports from the NAHT that school nurseries would be forced to cut places to deliver the offer
  • Olympic Stadium tenancy contract- disclosure (1)

    • Reference: 2015/3159
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 21 October 2015
    Will you write to the London Legacy Development Corporation to: a) urge them to comply with the order of the Information Commissioner and publish the entire unredacted contract for the Olympic Park tenancy in the interests of transparency b) request that they provide further details regarding the commercial confidentiality which they say prevents them from publishing the contract
  • Olympic Stadium tenancy contract- disclosure (2)

    • Reference: 2015/3160
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 21 October 2015
    Will you write to West Ham United, E20 and Newham Council to confirm that subject to the agreement of the LLDC they would be happy for the contract regarding the tenancy of the Olympic Stadium to be published in its entirety
  • Public toilets

    • Reference: 2015/2553
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 16 September 2015
    On the 12th August 2008 you issued a press release titled "Boris Johnson calls on London businesses to open their toilets to the public" urging every London Borough to sign up to the Community Toilet scheme whereby local pubs, cafes and shops are provided with financial support in exchange for welcoming visitors to use their toilets freely and without having to make a purchase. Can you set out what progress has been over the last seven years in the adoption of the Community Toilet scheme across London? Can you also set out how Mayoral Decision 1529, which allocates £56,000 of...
  • Correspondence in response to Mayor's Questions

    • Reference: 2015/1650
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    Further to MQ 2015/1185, answers to Mayor's Questions should not be confidential. The point of questions is that they are a matter of public record to hold you to account. Would you clarify your response or reconsider your response, publishing all correspondence sent in reply to Mayor's Questions with sensitive information redacted where necessary?
  • Pride in London 2015

    • Reference: 2015/1715
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    Despite there being much controversy over the views expressed by some UKIP members on LGBT issues do you accept that ultimately UKIP should be allowed to fully participate in this year’s Pride event? Considering the funding that the Greater London Authority has committed to Pride between 2013 – 2017 (Mayoral Decision 1124) will you also give thought to informing the organisers of Pride that the exclusion of UKIP on ‘safety grounds’ is a dubious concept and potentially provides support to foreign authorities that ban LGBT groups from marching at all on such grounds.