Search questions

• Reference: 2017/4978
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 14 December 2017

Could you provide an update to your response to my question 2017/3029 on this matter?

• Reference: 2017/4981
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 14 December 2017

The current London Plan policy says: "Boroughs may in their LDFs introduce a presumption against development on back gardens or other private residential gardens…". Why does your draft London Plan not include an equivalent presumption to prevent 'garden grabbing' from inappropriate extensions and development?

• Reference: 2017/4334
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

The London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) in a freedom of information request (reference 17-056) provided details of artists' workspace currently in Hackney Wick/Fish Island. What audits has the GLA or LLDC carried on the number and type of businesses and jobs they supported in this area over the past ten years? Please include dates of audits and any relevant reports or findings.

• Reference: 2017/3964
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 12 October 2017

Vittoria Wharf was one of the first buildings in the UK to be listed as an Asset of Community Value and is widely recognised as a strategic hub for providing affordable workspace for creative and artistic industries in Hackney Wick. How is the part-demolition of Vittoria Wharf, to provide a pedestrian bridge, consistent with your manifesto promise of "providing dedicated small workspace with live-in space so that creative industries, artists and the fashion industry are given extra support to flourish"?

• Reference: 2017/3965
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 12 October 2017

Will you make public all the documentation showing why the H14 and H16 bridges are needed for the Sweetwater development? If there is a contractual financial arrangement, this should be made clear.

• Reference: 2017/3038
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 10 August 2017

Assistant Director Decision 2093 (March 2017) approved expenditure of £13,000 to prepare three reports to provide an evidence base on sports facilities to support the London Plan. The decision states "The risk of not doing this work is that the sports facilities policy in the London Plan will not be sufficiently supported by evidence and may be questioned for this at the Examination in Public." Could you provide an update on progress so far and provide dates when these reports will be published?

• Reference: 2017/3039
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 10 August 2017

A report looking into the costs of the London Stadium, as ordered by the GLA's Executive Director of Resources in February 2017, is due to be published in 'summer 2017'. Is this still the case? If not, when is publication now expected and will you share initial findings in the interim?

• Reference: 2017/3040
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 10 August 2017

Will the National Sports Centre still be managed by Transport for London (TfL) under a shared service model and, if so, when will this begin?

• Reference: 2017/3041
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 10 August 2017

How many assets in the GLA's property portfolio are a) Grade II listed and b) do not have a conservation management plan assigned to them?

• Reference: 2017/3045
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 10 August 2017

In response to President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris climate change agreement, mayors from more than 250 cities in the USA have voted to transition to 100 per cent renewable energy by 2035. Will you adopt a similar pledge for London and your forthcoming Environment Strategy?