Search questions

• Reference: 2014/5109
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

In the light of your failure to properly answer my previous question MQ2014/4271,can you confirm whether you will look to compensate those residents who have suffered financially as a result of your Deputy Mayor's last-minute decision to halt eviction proceedings?

• Reference: 2014/5110
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Further to the welcome review of your Office for Policing and Crime's planned disposal of residential buildings managed by Crown Housing Association in the London Borough of Merton, will you ensure that those residents who have already been evicted are given the opportunity to return to their former homes?

• Reference: 2014/4269
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 19 November 2014

At what point did you decide to cancel the planned eviction of residents living in properties owned by the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) in Merton? Please confirm when this decision was communicated to Crown Housing Association which leases these homes on behalf of the MOPAC.

• Reference: 2014/4270
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 19 November 2014

Can you confirm the long-term intention of the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) with regard to the management and ownership of residential properties in the Raynesfield Estate, Merton?

• Reference: 2014/4271
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 19 November 2014

Will you compensate those residents who have suffered financially as a result of your last-minute decision to halt eviction proceedings on the Raynesfield Estate in Merton? (I understand that a number of residents have been left with substantial (and unnecessary) moving and storage costs, all of which could have been avoided if your decision had been communicated within a reasonable timeframe).

• Reference: 2014/4272
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 19 November 2014

Please provide further details of your recent review of the disposal of residential properties owned by the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC).

• Reference: 2014/4277
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 19 November 2014

How are you ensuring that, in selling assets now, the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) does not lose out on future increases in land and property values and the opportunity to gain valuable revenue income? To what extent were options for joint ventures and/or long-term leases (both of which would provide a longer term income stream) considered?

• Reference: 2014/3195
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

Please provide a list, broken down by borough, of all residential units the Mayor's Office of Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) intend to sell across London in the 2013-16 period?

• Reference: 2014/3196
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

How will you ensure that the decision taken by the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) to reduce the size of their residential portfolios does not conflict with wider Mayoral objectives, including those to increase the number of affordable homes across London and prevent homelessness?

• Reference: 2014/3197
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

How do you respond to the news that a number of families living on the Raynesfield Estate in Merton are facing homelessness - with many more facing the prospect of moving far away from friends, family and local schools - following the decision taken to reduce the size of the residential portfolio owned by the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and Metropolitan Police Service (MPS).