Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

  • Gambling advertising (1)

    • Reference: 2022/5312
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 15 December 2022
    How many times has the TfL/GLA working group met to discuss a TfL gambling advert ban?

  • Gambling advertising (2)

    • Reference: 2022/5313
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 15 December 2022
    When was the first meeting of the TfL/GLA working group to discuss a TfL gambling advert ban?

  • Gambling advertising (3)

    • Reference: 2022/5314
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 15 December 2022
    Is a gambling advert ban on TfL services a priority for your office?

  • Gambling advertising (5)

    • Reference: 2022/5316
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 15 December 2022
    Do you expect to make a decision on a TfL gambling advert ban by the end of this term in office?

  • Gambling advertising (7)

    • Reference: 2022/5318
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 15 December 2022
    Have you followed the same process for insight into a gambling advert ban as you did the junk food advert ban?

  • TfL Bus Wraparound (1)

    • Reference: 2022/5324
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 15 December 2022
    On TfL buses there are adverts claiming that all London buses are zero-emission and low-emission. The 'zero-emission' is in large font with 'low-emission' in smaller font. Given that the bus fleet are all low emission but only about 10% are zero-emission is this is false advertisement, and should the font sizes should be reversed?

  • TfL Bus Wraparound (2)

    • Reference: 2022/5325
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 15 December 2022
    The wraparound advert is extremely misleading as you have set a target of a zero-emission bus fleet by 2034. Will you rectify these advertisements and also publish your actual zero-emissions data on buses?

  • Impact of ULEZ

    • Reference: 2022/5329
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 15 December 2022
    At the Environment Committee’s roundtable small businesses supported bettering air quality in London; however, concerns were raised that the expanded ULEZ will negatively impact them as the infrastructure to support them is not in place. How are you going to support businesses which are focussed on environmental change to not be financially impacted by the expanded ULEZ?

  • ULEZ Expansion Health Impact (1)

    • Reference: 2022/5330
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 15 December 2022
    Table 6-7 of the ‘London-wide ULEZ Integrated Impact Assessment (ULEZ Scheme IIA)’ shows that, contrary to your claims, the expansion of ULEZ will make almost no difference to pollution in areas with larger ethnic group populations. Will you now admit expanding ULEZ has nothing to do with cleaning up pollution and more to do with your war on car users?

  • ULEZ Expansion Health Impact (2)

    • Reference: 2022/5331
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 15 December 2022
    Page 83 of the ‘London-wide ULEZ Integrated Impact Assessment (ULEZ Scheme IIA)’ notes the time limited exemption for Blue Badge Holders, however: “This is valid as long as their vehicle doesn't change tax class.” This policy would therefore economically punish disabled Londoners who, for whatever reason, may need to change their car to one in a different tax class. Why are you doing this to disabled Londoners?