Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

  • New Year's eve

    • Reference: 2000/0411
    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2000
    What has he learned from the fiasco of this year's abortive New Year's Eve Plans and can he now explain the plans he has for the traditional midnight gathering in Trafalgar Square and the concomitant legal and financial details?
  • Business Advisory Forum

    • Reference: 2000/0432
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2000
    With regard to your Business Advisory Forum, please would you set out the A) Membership; and B) Terms of Reference and advise on A) How many times it has met; and B) What the Forum has discussed so far? .
  • Budget 2001/02

    • Reference: 2000/0470
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2000
    a) what will be the increase in precept anticipated to result from the Mayor's budget proposals announced so far; b) what account did the Mayor take of council tax subsidy limitation penalties in costing his proposals?
  • Lord Rogers

    • Reference: 2000/0454
    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2000
    The Mayor will be aware that his unpaid Cabinet advisor on urban strategy, Lord Rogers, is in addition a paid consultant to the Greater London Authority on urban task force principles. Does the Mayor think that this reresents a conflict of interests? .
  • PPP

    • Reference: 2000/0471
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2000
    Is the Mayor satisfied with discussions with the government concerning PPP, and will he update the Assembly on progress and decisions made to date?
  • Crystal Palace

    • Reference: 2000/0472
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2000
    In relation to the Mayor's decision formally to object to liquor license applications at the proposed Crystal Palace development, will he a) disclose the legal advice upon which he based his decision; and b) state the costs incurred by the GLA in pursuance of this objection, including all legal costs and dispursement and staff time expended?
  • Response to Consultations

    • Reference: 2000/0473
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2000
    Have the government yet released to the Mayor the data underlying the new Indices of Multiple Deprivation, and if not, what action does he propose to take to ensure that London is not disadvantaged in the allocation of Neighbourhood Renewal Fund monies? .
  • New Year's Eve

    • Reference: 2000/0339
    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2000
    Is the Mayor satisfied that the organisational and financial preparations for the New Year's Eve 2000 party, which he is responsible for, have been successful and fully transparent?
  • More London Bridge

    • Reference: 2000/0361
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2000
    Will the Mayor a) undertake a detailed survey into the costs and adequacy of accommodation at alternative buildings to the proposed ones at More London Bridge? and b) specifically seek the views of the London Assembly, before entering into any binding agreement to take over the lease of the More London Bridge premises? .
  • TfL Public Relations / Stake holder Communications Contract

    • Reference: 2000/0362
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2000
    Will the Mayor a) Confirm that TfL has invited tenders for a contract to provide services for the management of consultation and managing communications in relation to the proposed congestion charge scheme b) State if a contract has been awarded, and if so: (i) to whom (ii) for what period (iii) at what cost to TfL and/or the GLA (iv) for precisely what services and why c) If a contract has been awarded (i) precisely what service is it anticipated will be provided and why (ii) the anticipated length of the contract (iii) what sum has been suggested to cover...