Search questions

• Reference: 2016/0187
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

While not opposed to 24 hour tube operation, a constituent has given me cause to question its Benefit-Cost appraisal. Has this been published? Has it been independently scrutinised? Given that most of the benefits are apparently thought to accrue to the Central London economy, can you clarify precisely what these will be and how many additional passengers are expected to use the 24 hour services.

• Reference: 2016/0188
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

What priority, and recommendation for your successor, are you giving to this project? How many TfL staff are currently working on it and in particular on its business case and predicted benefits?

• Reference: 2016/0189
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

Can you explain the thinking that lay behind the decision of TfL to sign up to support "Electronics Watch"? Given the decision of TfL to sign up to support "Electronics Watch" what other ethical procurement initiatives are TfL actively seeking to support/already supporting? Given that TfL has now signed up to "Electronics Watch", will you be ensuring the wider GLA family will also sign up to support this and other similar initiatives?

• Reference: 2016/0190
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

Further to my question 2015/4016 - what crimes constituted the use of a Fixed Penalty Notice in the years i) 2012 ii) 2013 iii) 2014 and iv) 2015? If there has been any change in the list of these crimes please can you provide an explanation as to why?