Search questions

• Reference: 2017/4315
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

Transport for London (TfL) has raised concerns about "reducing pedestrian circulation space at such a critical, central location" and inadequate cycling facilities arising from Southwark Council's planning application (reference 16/AP/3075) to build on Peckham Square. In light of another recent pedestrian fatality, will you call on the borough to suspend issuing planning permission until there is an independent review of space required to provide for a significant increase in walking and cycling at that location?

• Reference: 2017/4316
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

Future increases in walking and cycling, not least the cycle superhighway identified in the London Plan for Peckham High Street, and space that might be required for this, should have been considered in Southwark council's Peckham Square plans. Why did the comments and observations from Transport for London (TfL) on the Peckham Square planning application not highlight the applicant's failure to comply with the network management duty?

• Reference: 2017/4317
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

When has Transport for London (TfL) highlighted to local planning authorities the network management duty requirement, regarding reserving space to accommodate future forecasts of increased walking and cycling?

• Reference: 2017/4318
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

Is the current approach from Transport for London (TfL) to the network management duty still adequate in light of the modal shift targets in your draft Transport Strategy?

• Reference: 2017/4319
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

To allow for comparisons of 2016 serious injury figures with previous years, Transport for London (TfL) and the Department for Transport (DfT) are working together to back-estimate the number of casualties that would have been reported by the police using an injury-defined rather than a severity-defined system. When and where will the estimates be published?

• Reference: 2017/4320
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

Could you give an update on the status of each of the eight junctions with consultations "that have either been completed or will be completed soon" that you referred to in your response to my question 2017/2200?

• Reference: 2017/4321
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

In answer to my question 2017/2200 you stated "The remaining [25] junctions are at an early stage of design and therefore it is too soon to provide an implementation timetable". Five months on, will you give an update on these junctions?

• Reference: 2017/4322
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

A constituent was cycling eastwards on cycle superhighway 2 (Whitechapel Road). As they were cycling past the bus stop opposite Adler Street, a pedestrian stepped out, having been hidden behind the advertising panel on the bus stop, resulting in a near miss. Has Transport for London (TfL) investigated whether advertising panel blind spots at bus stop bypasses pose a risk to the safety of people walking and cycling?

• Reference: 2017/4323
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

Will you confirm that no bus operator that fails to provide toilets for its bus drivers will receive a Transport for London (TfL) endorsement for the Bus Operator of the Year award?

• Reference: 2017/4324
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 November 2017

Please provide a complete list of the type of toilet facilities available to bus drivers at all 624 bus route termini, identifying whether these are a) staff toilets, b) third party toilets with 24 hour access, or c) third party toilets with limited access?