Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

  • ULEZ consultation (14)

    • Reference: 2022/4200
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2022
    Please disclose any documents or correspondence in relation to the intended publication date for the ULEZ expansion consultation report, including: a) Previous publication dates which have since been changed or rejected, and any justification given for these. b) Proposals for the publication date which have been rejected, and any justification given for these. c) Proposals to move the publication date, and any justification given for these. d) The current intended publication date, and any justification given for this.
  • Adult Education Budget (1)

    • Reference: 2022/4201
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2022
    Can you please specify how much taxpayer money will be given for Unionlearn as set out in decision MD3016?
  • Adult Education Budget (2)

    • Reference: 2022/4202
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2022
    In decision MD3016 the policy change states the AEB will be used in “establishing and engaging networks of union reps to raise awareness of the value of learning; and to support, signpost and encourage employees into relevant in-work learning opportunities, particularly those delivered by Hubs as part of the Mayor’s Skills Academies and Quality Mark-endorsed providers”. Why wasn’t this done already and should this be done with all organisations with large workforce-based memberships?
  • Adult Education Budget (3)

    • Reference: 2022/4203
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2022
    Mayoral decision MD3016 provides full funding for Londoners unable to evidence being in receipt of state benefits. Can you please provide an example of where someone in receipt of state benefits cannot prove it?
  • Adult Education Budget (4)

    • Reference: 2022/4204
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2022
    According to decision MD3016 Level 4 qualifications “would be limited to Londoners who are unemployed or in low-paid work (below the London Living Wage) regardless of prior qualification level”. Surely Level 4 qualification funding should be open to all?
  • Hot Weather Buses Risk Assessment

    • Reference: 2022/4207
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2022
    I am reliably informed that there is no Risk Assessment for hot weather for Transport for London and Go Ahead London – TfL's largest Bus Operator. What impact does this have on bus drivers when there are Met Office Red Extreme Weather Warnings?
  • Scrappage Scheme (1)

    • Reference: 2022/4208
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2022
    At the 3rd November Plenary, to which you were invited but chose not to attend, your Deputy Mayor for Communities and Social Justice Dr Debbie Weekes-Bernard said that you have allocated funds for a scrappage scheme. Was she correct?
  • Scrappage Scheme (2)

    • Reference: 2022/4209
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2022
    At the 3rd November Plenary Dr Debbie Weekes-Bernard told me: “We can't announce the scrappage scheme until the decision is made.” Was she correct?
  • Scrappage Scheme (3)

    • Reference: 2022/4210
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2022
    With regard to your Deputy Mayor for Communities and Social Justice’s claim at 3rd November Plenary that “We can't announce the scrappage scheme until the decision is made”, do you accept that not announcing what a scheme would look like will have the impact of increasing the concerns of any Londoner who needs to drive but who would only be able to replace their car if they are certain they will qualify for a well-funded scrappage scheme?
  • Support to operators/flexible workspace (1)

    • Reference: 2022/4211
    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 17 November 2022
    Your recent decision MD3005/Support to operators of affordable, flexible workspace mentions a net-zero aim. Can you please elaborate on how part of the £200,000 allocated to this scheme will achieve a net-zero element?