Search questions

• Reference: 2024/1676
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 23 May 2024

In decision MD3014, you made the restriction of free travel for Older Persons’ Freedom Pass and 60+ London Oyster photocard holders between the hours of 4:30am and 9:00am on weekdays permanent. Since then, you said it was a benefit of your off-peak fares trial on Fridays that this restriction was removed. When you evaluate this trial will you make a fresh assessment on the costs and benefits of this restriction?

• Reference: 2024/1677
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 23 May 2024

You have previously ruled out integrating Oyster and contactless payment directly into the Transport for London (TfL) cycle hire scheme. Will you be able to achieve this integration using further investment in changes to the back-office systems for the cycle hire scheme, and are you confident that the cycle hire scheme is sufficiently integrated as it uses a unique payment system?

• Reference: 2024/1678
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 23 May 2024

Rival cycle hire schemes in London are now expanding their footprint well beyond the area covered by the Transport for London (TfL) cycle hire scheme. What plans is TfL currently pursuing to support cycle hire in parts of London where the TfL cycle hire scheme does not operate?

• Reference: 2024/1679
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 23 May 2024

Could you confirm the current walking and cycling provision for each borough in London by providing a table that includes: a) km of protected cycle route, b) number of low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), c) length of road inside LTNs, d) length of protected cycle routes inside LTNs, and e) length of cycleways inside LTNs?

• Reference: 2024/1680
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 23 May 2024

Further to your answer to MQ 2023/1897, could you provide an updated list of new pedestrian crossings Transport for London (TfL) has delivered on red routes from May 2016 to April 2024? Could you provide this data by borough and year, and with individual location grid references, if this information is available?

• Reference: 2024/1681
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 23 May 2024

In Schedule 10 – Design and Construction Requirements of the agreement between Transport for London (TfL) and Riverlinx to build the Silvertown Road Tunnel, there was an outdated reference in section 2.1.2 to the 2014 edition of the London Cycle Design Standards (LCDS). What standards is TfL expecting Riverlinx to build cycling elements of the Silvertown Road Tunnel to, and has TfL requested any update or correction to the project agreement?

• Reference: 2024/1682
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 23 May 2024

What engagement have Transport for London (TfL) or Riverlinx had with local groups, including walking and cycling groups, on the final designs for the walking and cycling elements of the Silvertown Road Tunnel?

• Reference: 2024/0938
• Question by: Emma Best
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

In response to question 2024/0753, you stated that ‘far from being a failure’ Solar Together had been ‘successful’. Do you think this would be surprising news to the 1500+ people who had cause to submit a complaint regarding the scheme?

• Reference: 2024/0939
• Question by: Emma Best
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

In response to question 2024/0753, you stated that ‘far from being a failure’ Solar Together had been ‘successful’. Given that the evaluation will not be completed until the ‘Spring’, by which measure do you consider the scheme successful?

• Reference: 2024/0940
• Question by: Emma Best
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

In response to question 2024/0753, you stated that ‘the contract for the evaluation has now been awarded and data-gathering and analysis is underway’ and that ‘the GLA is due to receive a report in Spring’. Please can you confirm who is undertaking the evaluation?