Search questions

• Reference: 2014/2997
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

TfL recently confirmed that capacity will be boosted on this severely overcrowded route, beginning in the autumn. Please provide the date from which additional buses will be brought into service on this route. Please also provide an update on the longer-term solution of running a new Kidbrooke Village to North Greenwich route.

• Reference: 2014/2998
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

Your response to MQ number 2014/2689 did not disclose a health and safety target temperature for London buses. Please confirm whether or not TfL has such a target and, if it does, please let me know what it is.

• Reference: 2014/2999
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

In your answer to my question 1381/2013 in May last year, you stated that you would be testing emissions of the New Bus for London on route 24. Now you have had a year to compare results, will you please publish them in full, including the average mpg for the bus, broken down by month?

• Reference: 2014/3000
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

The Transport Secretary recently announced that Crossrail could be extended to Hertfordshire. Please list any representations you have made to the Government on this or other extensions to Crossrail.

• Reference: 2014/3001
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

Thamesmead is one of the largest areas of London to have no railway station of its own. Have you studied the potential for a future extension of Crossrail to the area?

• Reference: 2014/3002
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

Some residents groups around Vauxhall want TfL to remove the gyratory at Vauxhall Cross but retain the bus station. Will TfL model the impact of this option on traffic levels, journey times, air and noise pollution levels, and the bus network, and release the results to the public?

• Reference: 2014/3003
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

Of the 433 respondents to TfL's consultation on changes to be made at this gyratory, 220 supported the introduction of segregated cycle lanes and/or advance stop lines at the traffic lights for cyclists. Please give the reasons why the decision has been taken by TfL not to implement to the wishes of 52% of respondents.

• Reference: 2014/3004
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

How much did this public consultation cost?

• Reference: 2014/3005
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

Eight key stakeholders - LB Camden, LB Islington, Camden Cycling Campaign, Sustrans, UCL, Southwark Living Streets, University of the Arts and Cycling Embassy of Great Britain - expressed their concern about the lack of segregated, mandatory cycle lanes in TfL's plans for Kings Cross gyratory, yet TfL plan to go ahead without introducing them. Will TfL continue to ignore comments from key stakeholder groups in all of the impending Better Junctions reviews?

• Reference: 2014/3006
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 September 2014

Given that the Mayor and TfL are not minded to pursue the replacement of the Old Street Roundabout with a crossroad design, to what extent is TfL’s position based on its wish to benefit financially from the construction of a new tower block on that site?