Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • 24 hour Freedom Pass on Overground Rail in Enfield & Haringey

    • Reference: 2012/0012-1
    • Question by: Joanne McCartney
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    Many residents in Enfield & Haringey rely on the overground rail network but they cannot yet use their freedom pass 24 hours a day and are at a disadvantage compared to residents living near tube services. What action have you, and will you take to ensure that all freedom pass holders can access overground rail services 24 hours a day?
  • Kings Cross Gyratory

    • Reference: 2012/0040-1
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    In your answer to question 1372 / 2012 you state that 'A series of key stakeholder workshops will be organised in June which will allow various parties to discuss their aspirations for the work at King's Cross Gyratory and to highlight the issues that affect local residents.' Given the confusion that has arisen with my constituents regarding works to the King's Cross Gyratory in the past can you please answer each of the following in full: a) Please provide a list of all the 'key stakeholder groups' who will be invited to these workshops b) Please outline details of how...
  • Concern (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    Yes, Peter, and that is the sort of response I have been getting for the last couple of years, and luckily I can say to you that the Borough of Lambeth have recently run a most successful campaign using ads; it is the campaign 'Know the Difference'. It is a campaign that Assembly Member Kit Malthouse in his role when he was head of Mayor's Office for Police and Crime (MOPAC) endorsed and commended. It has been taken onboard by other people and the only organisation that did not commit to it locally in Lambeth was TfL. These campaigns were...
  • Affordable Homes for Rent

    • Reference: 2010/0105-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    What barriers prevent a greater proportion of affordable homes being delivered for rent, given the planned changes to housing benefit?
  • Strategic Leadership

    • Reference: 2010/0106-1
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Is there adequate strategic leadership of housing policy and its implementation in London?
  • Housing Devolution

    • Reference: 2010/0107-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    What are the risks and opportunities of the proposal for a new Housing and Regeneration department within the GLA?
  • Families in Housing Need

    • Reference: 2010/0108-1
    • Question by: Steve O'Connell
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    How have the prospects for families in housing need improved since the current Mayoralty began?
  • Strategic Leadership (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Could you, Mr Blakeway, promise me not to carry anything over from the last administration with regard to housing? Could you promise three things really: first of all, could you promise not to disappoint Londoners with oversold targets that are unachievable? Could you promise me not to raise the aspirations of Londoners and then dash those hopes and blame someone else? Could you also promise not to build a home for somebody in housing need but actually deliver a rabbit hutch? So in short, can you assure me that the strategies will be realistic, achievable and honest, which would be...
  • Strategic Leadership (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Steve O'Connell
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Richard, a question for you. Would you not agree, following on from that debate you just had, that inflexible percentage targets are indeed a tired and lazy analysis of the needs of our residents?
  • Housing Devolution (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Last week it was announced that the Office for Tenants and Social Landlords, otherwise known as Tenant Services Authority (TSA), was to be devolved and no longer a public body. I am just wondering in the context of housing devolution in London where all these regulatory powers will be going.